Australia is a country where the state and territorial capitals utterly dominate the nation, containing well over 70% of our population - the Big 5 of Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth, and Adelaide have 65% of our whole population between the five of them. There are numerous reasons for every one of these cities being originally chosen for the state capital going back to when they were all seperate colonies - but what if those sites were different? How could that happen? What would be the long term effects?
With a POD after 1788 but before 1901, I challenge you to realistically justify a different state capital for every state and territory of Australia (excepting Canberra, unless you want to choose an alternate national capital too).
I would say that Melbourne didn't have to be state capital, and was founded quite late in comparison to the others. If John Batman fails to settle the area for whatever reason, I could see the site of Geelong serving as the state capital, being founded 8 years earlier than Melbourne.
With a POD after 1788 but before 1901, I challenge you to realistically justify a different state capital for every state and territory of Australia (excepting Canberra, unless you want to choose an alternate national capital too).
I would say that Melbourne didn't have to be state capital, and was founded quite late in comparison to the others. If John Batman fails to settle the area for whatever reason, I could see the site of Geelong serving as the state capital, being founded 8 years earlier than Melbourne.