MrP
Banned
No, I meant that the USN combined with the High Seas Fleet could do it. A large part of the RN is busy bottling up the HSF in port. That means the USN, although it couldn't take on the RN in a pitched battle, can do enough commerce raiding to seriously hurt the trade needed to keep Britain in the war.
Besides the fact that America wouldn't be sending stuff to Britain itself, of course.
This is all highly hypothetical of course because I don't think a CP America is very likely at all...and I'm not a WW1 expert, anyway. Paging P...
Hm, I'm not optimistic. I doubt the basing facilities in the Canaries are up to handling dreadnoughts for starters. But the main problem with a CP America is money and common sense. If Britain has loads of money she can give America because she's cut trade links between Germany and the USA, and France is offering lots of money, too, it makes more sense to accept that money than get entangled in a war that'll necessitate a vast increase in US military spending. In a word, it's a choice between taking Franco-British cash and laughing all the way to the bank or burning money for an uncertain chance of victory that leaves everyone poorer.
There's also the Trinitrotoluene problem. The USA IOTL is the big supplier of this to the Entente, IIRC. No USA supporting the Entente and the loss by France of the Briey Basin means that shell production is kinda fucked. Certainly compared to OTL.
One can get an America that dislikes the UK, but then I'd opine that the UK will avoid one of antagonising the USA or getting involved in a war that'll see the Empire really threatened. So I tend to hmmm thoughtfully at scenarios of CP-America nowadays. But I'm not the final word by any means.