1982- For Equal Rights
1982- For Equal Rights
1982 was becoming a first sign for the Udall Administrations work thus far and he was doing quite favorably to say the least. The economy was recovery and the stimulus package of giving people money for necessities did quite well, proving the concept for further testing down the line for something akin to a minimum income. Additionally, the final works were coming over his healthcare plan and a piece of legislation that would be applied first before it: The Vocational Education Finance Reform Act or VEFRA, a piece of legislature that would see see increased government investment in vocational schools and reforms on matters such as payment. The act was designed to ensure the longetivity of the American workforce by creating large subsidies and compensations for those attending and graduating vocational school as part of a means to ensure that there would be a healthy number of blue collar workers. The arrangement was the result of collaborating with prominent union leaders and analysts since the Solidarity Day march, seeing it as an opportuity to encourage and support young people in going into blue collar jobs. Additionally, the act would expand the variety of vocations supported; while potential for classes on basic coding were put into future consideration, one field that was given priority consideration was those related in the medical department. Some have speculated this was part of President Udall's greater plan for universal healthcare by growing the number of available qualified members of the medical field and make it easier. Additionall,y, it was announced VEFRA would be followed by two more pieces of legislature: one was a plan to examine and overhaul vocational education, as it was felt it was a neglected part of the education system thus far. The other was less known, but it was rumored that it would make postsecondary university heavily subsidized or possibly even free for people pursuing a career in various medical fields. However, despite their successes, in the hustle and bustle, a date had passed near the end of summer that would gather a firestorm of attention.
The ratification deadline for the Equal Rights Amendment.
The Equal Rights Amendment would end up just failing to pass, just 2 states short of the 38 states needed to pass for it to become an amendment. Initially seemed like destined to pass, female conservatives such as Phyllis Schlafly would mobilize support against it and would be aided by the Reagan administration though in doing so, widening the gaps within the Republican party. However, this just led to the Democrats growing further together in support of it and fighting against it. However, discussions of the amendment fell to the side as the economic troubles became the dominant discussion point among American voters and politicians. While the amendment was given an extension for the ratification dateline by Reagan as a way to avoid confronting the question, the economic troubles and other events proved to be enough of a distraction for the deadline to pass. [1]
However, rather than disenheart people... it would regalvanze it. In fact, beyond providing a fresh shot of energy, the time that had past provided something equally valuable: perspective. Looking back at the amendment proposal with fresh eyes meant being able to rethink certain matters on it, such as sufficient coverage on certain details and how far it would go in doing so. One point of observation was looking at the history of the amendment and who supported it. Women considered of the working class actually were opposed to the amendment in its initial format. They pointed out that women employed in certain jobs needed special protections concerning working conditions, employment hours and other stipulations. In fact, this point became even more clear given how just a year prior, the Solidarity March occurred, reminding the voters the importance and the power of the working class, which included women. With this in mind, many women from various backgrounds, With new vigor along with the support of the Udall Administration and a massive hold, Congress went back into analyzing the Equal Rights Amendment in its writing along with potential challenges to show what needs to be changed.
Beyond just reviving interest for the Equal Rights Amendment, this became one of the major factors in a brand new wave of feminism that would be established in the early 1980s, alongside with the HIV epidemic and other factors. First-wave feminism, starting in the early 20th century, focused mainly on suffrage and overturning legal obstacles to gender equality such as voting rights and property rights. Afterwards, starting in the early 1960s, second-wave feminism would broaden its issues to include discussions on sexuality, family, the workplace, reproductive rights, de facto inequalities, and official legal inequalities, namely the economic factors. However, the movement would end in the late 1970s due to the escalating divisions around sexuality and sexual activity. Arguments over the stances on pornography, prostitution, and transgender women along with the growing conflicts that minority women were once again being marginalized from discussions would cause the movement's momentum to decline, especially under the Reagan administration and the economic poblems [2]
However, with the presence of the Udall Administration's reformative stance, there presented a unique opportunity... one to mvoe beyond the problems of the 1960s and 1970s and do more... do better. The past 20 years taught them alot and there was now the rise of a new breed of fighters, those who grew up in the Dismal Dozen, fresh and hungry for change and a better future. The beginning... of the third-wave.
[1]: Information taken from here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Rights_Amendment
[2]: Information taken from here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second-wave_feminism
Last edited: