An Age of Miracles III: The Romans Endure

Cryostorm

Donor
Monthly Donor
Hmm, I don't know when the double headed eagle came into play but at the beginning of the Empire, under Augustus, it was a single headed eagle
Ah, you are correct. It appears it morphed into the double-headed eagle around the 10th century and the Komnenian dynasty. Though it was a symbol for the region as early as the Hittites. So while the eagle is Roman the double-headed eagle is very much an Eastern Roman symbol.
 

Cryostorm

Donor
Monthly Donor
Also, not sure how much expense will be a factor for the Romans, in fact having a flag that includes purple could be a bit of a flex on other states, and a good countermeasure to counterfeit flags.
 
Also, not sure how much expense will be a factor for the Romans, in fact having a flag that includes purple could be a bit of a flex on other states, and a good countermeasure to counterfeit flags.
It's still really expensive. At most, it'll be flown in the capital and whichever army the Emperor is with at that moment, but no more. Everyone else will only get to fly various degrees of red.
 

Cryostorm

Donor
Monthly Donor
It's still really expensive. At most, it'll be flown in the capital and whichever army the Emperor is with at that moment, but no more. Everyone else will only get to fly various degrees of red.
That would probably be for the best actually, a lot of monarchies had special flags for when people of importance were in residence, particularly the ruler and their heir. Not like it would change the cost much either since those flags were usually made of upgraded materials anyways.

Bonus points, the drive for a cheaper purple, and red and gold, dye helps spur Roman chemistry and textiles.
 
That would probably be for the best actually, a lot of monarchies had special flags for when people of importance were in residence, particularly the ruler and their heir. Not like it would change the cost much either since those flags were usually made of upgraded materials anyways.

Bonus points, the drive for a cheaper purple, and red and gold, dye helps spur Roman chemistry and textiles.
The most frequent exposure to flags for a lot of people is going to be the army or the navy, which already employ red cross patterns aplenty. The Imperial standard is almost certainly purple, but I imagine they're likely the only people allowed to fly the purple itself.

The symbolic attachment of the color purple itself to the imperial institution is another reason I think it's less than likely to become the primary color of the Roman flag: in the same way that the Imperial Standard of Japan - which is tied symbolically to the Imperial family - is emphatically not the national flag of Japan.
 
The symbolic attachment of the color purple itself to the imperial institution is another reason I think it's less than likely to become the primary color of the Roman flag: in the same way that the Imperial Standard of Japan - which is tied symbolically to the Imperial family - is emphatically not the national flag of Japan.
Yeah if you were to ask Romans what the "symbol" and "colour" of their country is they'd probably tell you an Eagle and the colour Red
 
Rhomania's General Crisis, Part 15.1: Holding the Circle
Looks Sophia is getting successful at consolidating popular support. Recall at the start it was pretty much non-existent aside from Athena contacts.
It's something that's going to be developed a bit later, but I picture Sophia as being, while less intelligent, more people-savvy than either her mother Athena or grandfather Demetrios III.
Good point. Between that temper and bloodlust she's also 100% pure Sideros.
Did you think the blood of Timur is spent?! ;)
So, it's possible Gyranos' side winning might be better for the common man? Big IF, but possible.
Keep a pin in this thought as well. Can't think of more to say without going into spoilers.
It's a great reminder how lopsided this started that after two fairly significant victories the odds still feel stacked against Sophia. It does make me wonder what happens to a defeated tagma? They tend to follow their leaders, but could a fully defeated tagma have a new leader installed and switch sides. Seems like it could be a hard sell to the common soldier, but if the alternative is they can't be swayed and you either need to keep them in the field indefinitely or defeat them so thoroughly that you endanger the state post civil war that's bleak.

Sophia is making a good name for herself between her public appearances and the brutality of the tourmarchs' side around Smyrna. But the newly approved land reforms are really going to force her to deliver some big tangible gains for the people to win the PR battle.
I figure with the regular soldiers they could probably be turned with promise of amnesty and guarantee of pay at the rates to which they're used. Officers are more problematic, because with the hesychastic lodge memberships fighting against lodge brothers is anathema, so getting them to turn is a lot harder unless you can effectively get a lodge to flip en masse, which is an unlikely event.

And for the more stubborn, they can always be treated like the German POWs from the War of the Roman Succession, being sent off to forced labor projects or distributed as 'totally-not slaves' to buyers.

Roman flags: Personally, I've always defaulted to the Cross with 4 B's in my mind, largely out of habit. That's what I think of when I think of a Byzantine flag. The double-headed eagles I associated with the Emperors, as opposed to the Empire, to make a fine distinction. The slight variation of the eagles depending on the dynasty (the Vatatzes one is my favorite) is probably why.

A purple banner would certainly be one associated specifically with the Emperor, rather than a broader grouping. One of the OTL regalia of the Emperor were purple slippers, after all.

* * *

Rhomania’s General Crisis, Part 15.1-Holding the Circle:

As the summer of 1662 began to fade into autumn, the position of the Tourmarches in Constantinople did not look so well. The offensive into Thrakesia had crumbled into dust with the frontline roughly corresponding to the Opsikian-Thrakesian boundary line by the beginning of September. In Europe, Domestikos Pirokolos was picking at the Haemus Mountain defenses that separated Bulgaria from Thrace, threatening to break through.

Yet it was at this time that the advantages accruing to the Tourmarches, their relatively compact holdings compared to the fragmented nature of their foe’s, and their naval superiority really began to tell.

The offensive into Thrakesia had failed in securing the region for Constantinople but it had not been without consequence. During the War of the Roman Succession, all of the themes had increased the number of tourmai they fielded as their resources permitted. At the beginning of the War of Wrath they had begun doing the same. But the offensive into Thrakesia had badly disrupted the efforts there. In desperation, fresh units had been fed into the battle line piecemeal and taken horrific casualties. The effort had not been in vain but the cost had been high.

In contrast, other themes, including the Opsikian and Optimatic themes loyal to Constantinople, had been able to more carefully develop new tourmai. These tourmai would still be green and inexperienced but had more training under their belts and avoided the demoralization of being so badly shot up in their first engagements.

For that reason, Sarantenos was unable to launch an offensive of his own to match that of Pirokolos in Europe. Some stragglers from the furious march over Anatolia were trickling in, but they couldn’t compensate by themselves for the exhaustion and losses of existing units. And these bits were all the reinforcements Thrakesia could expect. The Anatolikon was consumed with the Army of Suffering, while Syria was facing down the Egyptian advance.

This illustrated the fragmented nature of the regions loyal to Empress Sophia, which significantly hampered efforts against the Tourmarches. Between Constantinople’s command of the sea and the Army of Suffering astride the main east-west Anatolian highway, Thessaloniki, Smyrna, and Antioch were effectively acting as their own units with their own resources. Communications between the three zones were limited and subject to interception, much less serious transfer of resources and reinforcements.

In contrast, the Opsikian, Optimatic, and Thracian themes formed a compact and well-developed holding, with high ability to move material and manpower (by the standards of the day) around to where it was most needed. The Tourmarches had the advantage of interior lines and with the War Room and its staff, which had all stayed loyal to Constantinople, they had the administrative and organizational knowledge to make use of them.

Constantinople’s strategy shifted with the failure of the initial Thrakesian offensive. The plan was that the Opsikian and Optimatic themes would continue their process of expanding their forces over the winter of 1662-63. With the resources of the two themes, this force would be able to overwhelm the lone theme of Thrakesia if it did not receive more reinforcements. Given Egyptian pressure on Syria and the Army of Suffering in Anatolikon, that did not seem likely. Once Thrakesia was eliminated, the resources of western Anatolia could be hurled into the contest for Roman Europe and would give a decisive advantage to Constantinople there.

In the meantime, Domestikos Pirokolos had to be held at bay, which was no small task. Most Roman soldiers were wary of crossing swords with the Lion of Panipat, the best friend of Odysseus and Iskandar the Younger, and the rough handling he’d given the Bulgarian and Thracian tagmata that had faced him in Bulgaria only encouraged this sentiment. An indirect approach was needed.

One was available and already had had significant effect. A direct assault from Thessaloniki to Thrace would have paralleled the Aegean’s northern shore but Constantinople’s maritime superiority had made using the coastal road too hazardous. Too much of it lay within gun range of offshore warships and even a twenty-gun sloop had more firepower than most infantry columns. Pirokolos had been forced to detour through Bulgaria, significantly slowing his advance and hampering his efforts to keep his forces supplied. Also, the longer supply lines meant he had to detach more forces to guard them, leaving less for the tip of the spear.

From Constantinople’s perspective, this needed to be dialed up, and it would be the navy’s task to do so. Naval raids against the enemy’s coastlines would be intensified, with shore parties landing to spread chaos further. These would not be intended to seize territory but they would destroy material, spread alarm, and force Thessaloniki to send forces to defend the threatened zones, leaving less for the tip of the spear. The same would be done to Thrakesia as well to keep that area off balance and more vulnerable to a renewed assault. This strategy was not new; Kometes Petros Laskaris had inaugurated it with his attack on Monemvasia and seizure of Patras in early spring, but significantly more resources were now being allocated, such as three tourmai sealifted to Patras for raids into the Morea.

Making this even more attractive was that even after factoring in the naval disparity, Thessaloniki could not copy this strategy nearly as effectively. Save for western Opsikia and Thrace west of the Hellespont, most of the shoreline loyal to Constantinople was on the Sea of Marmara or the Black Sea, completely inaccessible to ships loyal to Sophia.

On September 10, the largest naval clash of the war to date takes place off the island of Astakida, northeast of Crete. A massive Egyptian convoy is carrying grain for Constantinople and Kanaris is eager to intercept and capture it. Both Thessaloniki and Smyrna depended heavily on Egyptian imports of grain to feed their populations and the loss of those imposed serious hardships on the urban populations. Drawing more heavily on the hinterlands could make up the shortfall but that shifted the burden to the Macedonian and Thrakesian countryside.

Commanding the forces guarding the convoy is Andronikos Platanas, who had commanded the Roman contingent of the expedition against Algiers in 1642 and whose abrasive personality had done much to hamstring said expedition. He had been uncooperative and argumentative with the various other expeditionary contingents and during the bombardment of Algiers itself had stood off at long-range, causing very little damage to Algerian defenses.

His lack of energy and boldness at Algiers is completely absent at Astakida. When scout ships alert him to the approach of Kanaris, he promptly forms his escort into line-of-battle and moves to attack the opposing fleet. He had an advantage in hulls, 18-to-14, although the firepower ratio is skewed slightly more in his favor due to the larger average size of his ships.

Kanaris, equally bold, is not deterred by said odds. The convoy is the strategic objective, but trying to dodge around the escort to get at it, even if practical, is mentally galling. Like most naval commanders, he’d much rather have a go at enemy warships than merchantmen, especially ones challenging him directly. Besides, once the escort is eliminated, his ships can spread out more widely, making it easier to run down the convoy if it scatters.

The battle does not go as planned. Kanaris planned to use fire ships to make up for his material weakness but Platanas is wise to the tactic and has plenty of visibility and sea room to maneuver, unlike the targets of the fire ships at Lesbos. The fire ships are driven off by fregatai and burn out harmlessly. In the gunnery duel, the heavier throw weight of Platanas’s battle-line tells.

With the fall of night, Kanaris breaks off the engagement and successfully eludes Platanas’s efforts to pursue, but his force is too badly battered to make another effort at the convoy. Two of his ships, dismasted in the fight, are surrounded and forced to strike, while all of the remainder are badly shot up. Three of Platanas’s ships in particular were also roughly handled, but casualties are three-to-one in favor of Platanas and the convoy makes it to Constantinople without losing a single ship. For this victory, Platanas is granted a yearly stipend and a promotion to the rank of Doux.

Two weeks later, a different development on land goes the other way as Domestikos Pirokolos finally breaks through into the Thracian plain, whose far eastern end holds the Queen of Cities. Nereas, now in command of all forces in the field facing the Domestikos, avoids a set-piece battle, harassing the Macedonians and hovering just out of reach, slowing and frustrating the advance, but not stopping it. The strain is telling on Pirokolos’s men, who are suffering heavily from shortages of supplies of all kinds. One report in the Constantinople archives, noting the condition of sixteen prisoners taken by Nereas’s men, states that only five of the men have proper footwear.

Despite intelligence like this, Nereas will not change his strategy. He has a trump card for stopping Pirokolos and he is going to play that instead. Before Pirokolos can march on Constantinople, he must first get past Adrianople. During the War of the Roman Succession, the fortifications of the city had been massively expanded and upgraded, with the expectation that it might very well be here that the climactic battle would be fought. After the battle of Thessaloniki, the captive Vauban had gone over them to make suggestions for improvements.

The fortifications have been refurbished to make up wear and tear accumulated since then, while supplies of all kinds have been poured into magazines and warehouses in the city. The garrison has been expanded, including some guard tourmai. Situated at key crossroads needed for logistics and with such a powerful force inside, it is not a place that Pirokolos can mask and bypass if he hopes to have the strength to threaten Constantinople. It will have to be taken.
 
The fortifications have been refurbished to make up wear and tear accumulated since then, while supplies of all kinds have been poured into magazines and warehouses in the city. The garrison has been expanded, including some guard tourmai. Situated at key crossroads needed for logistics and with such a powerful force inside, it is not a place that Pirokolos can mask and bypass if he hopes to have the strength to threaten Constantinople. It will have to be taken.
Interesting and a real problem, although possibly an opportunity. If Pirokolos does try to mask and bypass it, but fakes the forward advance, he might have an opportunity to defeat the garrison in the open if they try to push through his masking forces and go for his supplies.
 
OTL the Greek rebels invented the technique/tactics of actually leading fireships under fire into the line of battle, with devastating effect, which included keeping the fireships crewed up to the very time they got attached to the target ship. Needless to say it was risky for the crews of the fireships but it worked during the entire Greek war of independence from memory you had roughly 50% success rate with 29 successful attacks out of 57 total.

One does have to wonder though how well the tactics would had fared against a better trained enemy than the Ottomans, the Egyptians having a fair share of French mercenary officers and and North African former corsairs in their crews did better surviving the attacks but still suffered losses in the open sea and even more when caught close to land, like when Miaoulis caught an Egyptian squadron in the gulf of Methone in April 1825 destroying 11 warships and transports including a 54. Against the Royal Navy? An interesting question.
 
off topic on the civil war.

I was wondering if oil machines will happen before coal is optimized in western europe.

At this point otl, several oil wells were already in use which in atl controlled by Georgia. While capital or wealth is in Constantinople to finance projects. Trabzon which is when printing press started in Europe adjacent to Georgia. Litetacy rates in Rhomania is I presume the highest so faster tech discovery?

Could oil fired machines predate coal fired machines?
 
off topic on the civil war.

I was wondering if oil machines will happen before coal is optimized in western europe.

At this point otl, several oil wells were already in use which in atl controlled by Georgia. While capital or wealth is in Constantinople to finance projects. Trabzon which is when printing press started in Europe adjacent to Georgia. Litetacy rates in Rhomania is I presume the highest so faster tech discovery?

Could oil fired machines predate coal fired machines?
from the little knowledge i have on these forms of energy, coal can be used without further refinement, crude oil cant. Asking a 16th-century chemist to create a refinery is a big ask. this is even before asking how to transport a volatile liquid. Coal can be transported relatively easily. In addition to all this, coal is what is need to create steal, which in turn would be used to create machines to power with said energy sources. so youll need coal no matter.
let me know if i got anything wrong. im a mechanical engineer, not a chemist or an expert in energy.
 
OTL the Greek rebels invented the technique/tactics of actually leading fireships under fire into the line of battle, with devastating effect, which included keeping the fireships crewed up to the very time they got attached to the target ship. Needless to say it was risky for the crews of the fireships but it worked during the entire Greek war of independence from memory you had roughly 50% success rate with 29 successful attacks out of 57 total.

One does have to wonder though how well the tactics would had fared against a better trained enemy than the Ottomans, the Egyptians having a fair share of French mercenary officers and and North African former corsairs in their crews did better surviving the attacks but still suffered losses in the open sea and even more when caught close to land, like when Miaoulis caught an Egyptian squadron in the gulf of Methone in April 1825 destroying 11 warships and transports including a 54. Against the Royal Navy? An interesting question.
I've thought about as well and think that against a better trained opponent it wouldn't be as effective, especially against one who is expecting such a tactic and has plenty of visibility and sea room in which to maneuver.
All this talk about flags has got me wondering if each of the guard tagma/themes have their own distinctive battle standards in the vein of the Roman Aquila.
I don't know if I've ever said so explicitly in the TL but always pictured them as having distinctive battle standards.
off topic on the civil war.

I was wondering if oil machines will happen before coal is optimized in western europe.

At this point otl, several oil wells were already in use which in atl controlled by Georgia. While capital or wealth is in Constantinople to finance projects. Trabzon which is when printing press started in Europe adjacent to Georgia. Litetacy rates in Rhomania is I presume the highest so faster tech discovery?

Could oil fired machines predate coal fired machines?
from the little knowledge i have on these forms of energy, coal can be used without further refinement, crude oil cant. Asking a 16th-century chemist to create a refinery is a big ask. this is even before asking how to transport a volatile liquid. Coal can be transported relatively easily. In addition to all this, coal is what is need to create steal, which in turn would be used to create machines to power with said energy sources. so youll need coal no matter.
let me know if i got anything wrong. im a mechanical engineer, not a chemist or an expert in energy.
The earliest coal-powered machines were water pumps for pumping out coal mines. They were extremely fuel-inefficient but that didn't matter because shipping costs were nonexistent. This allowed the earliest steam machines to be useful, at least in this niche, which provided the opportunity to further improve the technology so that it could then break out of that niche. I don't see how an oil-powered machine would get such an opening.
Does the Army of Suffering have its own emblems/flags too? Have they seized any major cities for a capital or are they very much decentralised?
They do not. At this point, the only major city they've seized is Laranda/Karaman, which is the closest they have to a capital but they are quite decentralized.


Update will be posted after Christmas.
 
Rhomania's General Crisis, Part 16.0: The Other Fires, Part 1
Rhomania’s General Crisis, Part 16.0-The Other Fires, part 1:

The fighting near the Aegean tends to dominate narratives of the period but there were several other conflicts also occurring in the Roman world. These tend to be subsumed under the broader label of the War of Wrath, but in many ways, these were separate conflicts that only intersected occasionally with the ‘main’ War of Wrath, that fought around the Aegean. These separate conflicts were the continuing Ottoman war, the fight between Egypt and Syria, the rebellion of the Army of Suffering, and the revolt in Sicily. (Bucking the trend, internally Carthage was quite peaceful, while in foreign policy it aligned with Sophia and the Despot of Sicily.)

Shahanshah Iskandar the Younger had made a truce with Strategos Sarantenos, and thereby in effect with Empress Sophia, but he felt that this agreement did not apply to any Romans who did not recognize the authority of Sophia. The Shah was having some political difficulties in his own camp, all related to the terms of peace and coexistence with the Romans.

Iskandar the Younger was one of those strange and suspicious persons who enjoy reading history for fun, and he was painfully aware of recent history. For seventy years now, since the start of the Eternal War sparked by the Great Uprising, the Roman and Ottoman-Persian Empires had relentlessly bloodied each other. Both had given and received heavy blows and the death tolls on both sides had been massive.

In the most definitive study of this period from modern historians, the zone of conflict between the two great empires is called ‘the battle-lands’. This comprises Syria, Mesopotamia, eastern Anatolia, and the Greater Aras region. [1] Nearly all of the fighting and dying had occurred in the battle-lands, which in 1600 are estimated to have a combined population of around seven million. The death toll over this period, not including the Great Crime, is estimated at between 2 to 2.5 million.

Iskandar would like that history to end. He had hoped that the agreement worked out with Odysseus would do so; it clearly had not. Other arrangements were needed. His demand for the 1596 border was a key part of that. It wiped out the Roman gains of the last half of the intense-war period, but also did not seek to restore the Ottoman gains of the first half. It seemed a good compromise, restoring a frontier that in the sixteenth century had been far more peaceful and stable than that of the following century.

However, there are others who feel different and this ties heavily into tensions in Iskandar’s camp. Disagreements between the Persians and Mesopotamians have been bubbling, particularly after the looming threat of Rhomania dissipated. Iskandar has just started using a new title, ‘Protector of the Guarded Domains of Iran and Iraq’, with the last two words raising some eyebrows in Mesopotamia.

The relationship of Mesopotamia to Ottoman Persia is complex. Iskandar clearly has some interest now of reintegrating the region back into the Ottoman Empire, although he is cautious. Historically, the area has been the heartland of the Ottoman state. The region itself doesn’t have much of a unique and specific identity as a group, and what there is of said identity is associated primarily with earlier Ottoman history. There are many Mesopotamians therefore who welcome, or are at least not opposed to, a reintegration. Yet there are others, particularly those who have benefited from the creation of a Mesopotamian state separate from the Ottomans, who are opposed to the idea.

At this stage, these tensions just complicate the alliance, rather than threaten it, but the Mesopotamians are invested in prosecuting the war against the Romans and Iskandar must acknowledge that investment. In an illustrated manuscript of the Shahnameh made in Baghdad at this time, Zahhak, the Arab demon-king, is presented with the face of Herakleios III. The baby-eating human-headed serpents that protruded from his shoulders have the faces of Plytos and Nereas. (Gyranos’s absence seems to be based on chance.)

Iskandar potentially has another, more subtle, reason for continuing to wage war vigorously against Romans. By attacking eastern Anatolia, Iskandar effectively prevents the Armeniakon and Chaldean themes, both loyal to Constantinople, from aiding the Tourmarches. This is a major boost to Sophia’s war effort and some historians have argued for an unofficial alliance worked out by Sarantenos and the Shah. It is in Iskandar’s interest to ensure that Sophia wins and the Tourmarches lose the civil war. There is no documentary evidence for such a plan, but both sides would have very good reason to keep that quiet.

The Shah’s siege of Amida lasts fifteen days. After his artillery blasts two practicable breaches in the ramparts, the city capitulates on terms. There is some argument in the camp since per the terms, only Ottoman, not Mesopotamian troops, will be allowed into the city. For good reason, both Iskandar and the inhabitants of Amida expect the Ottoman soldiers to be better behaved. That the Mesopotamians are angry that Amida pays a ransom and they don’t get an opportunity to sack the city proves the point.

They get the chance to scratch that itch to plunder soon enough. The ramparts are patched up and an Ottoman garrison installed to secure the lines of supply and communication with Mesopotamia and Persia but then Iskandar marches north. Past Amida, the focus is clearly not on conquest but on raiding, on a truly massive scale. The army of Iskandar cuts a swathe of devastation through eastern Anatolia.

The senior Roman commander in the region is Theophilos Gulielmos, Strategos of the Chaldean theme. His own tagma is largely intact but the Armeniakon tagma, kastron, and militia troops have been gutted by the Baghdad campaign. Some tourmai from the Opsikian and Optimatic tagmata, posted in the east to fight the Ottomans before the civil war began, are not enough to make up for this shortfall. While he is trying to muster up new tourmai as in the themes further east, the Armeniakon is lightly populated and underdeveloped. The Chaldean theme is better endowed in that regard, but not on the scale of any of the Aegean themes. Against the might of a fully mobilized Persia and Mesopotamia, the two are seriously outmatched.

But Theophilos spots an opportunity where the odds look more favorable and takes it. After leaving Amida, the Ottoman army has spread out in three units. This poses the obvious danger of letting it be defeated in detail but Iskandar takes the risk for three reasons. One is that this will ease issues of supplies in a rugged and sparsely populated area. The second is that this will allow the Ottomans to ravage a significantly broader swathe of territory, maximizing gains. And finally, the scope of devastation and the separation of army units will both pressure and tempt the Romans into engaging in a pitched battle, which Iskandar would prefer even if it starts at an initial disadvantage to him.

On July 15, Theophilos attacks an Ottoman column near Asmosaton, a largely Armenian town on the upper Euphrates. It is the central of the three Ottoman columns but it is numerically the weakest and positioned north of the Euphrates, which it just crossed. Theophilos hopes it can be pinned against the river and destroyed, which is why he chose it as his target.

The Ottomans, aware of the vulnerability involved in the river crossing, are on guard and fight fiercely when attacked. With many veterans, they put to excellent use their skill in rigging up field fortifications at short notice, blunting the Roman assault. But if left alone, it is almost certainly Theophilos will crush them on the field anyway. He just needs time.

He does not get it. The Ottoman columns march to the sound of the guns, the western column maneuvering to flank the Romans while the eastern, under the direct command of the Shah, force-marches to try and swing around the Roman rear and cut them off from retreat. Here the rugged terrain, which had helped the central Ottoman column blunt the Roman attack, works against the Ottomans, slowing their maneuvering. Theophilos manages to pull back in time to avoid being surrounded, but is chewed up by flank attacks in the process.

He takes eighteen hundred casualties which he can ill afford and has to abandon his wounded, artillery, and baggage on the field, a devastating blow to morale and his military capabilities. It is not the knockout blow for which Iskandar had aimed, but it is still a notable Ottoman victory. After Asmosaton, Iskandar continues his pillaging of Armeniakon. The continued existence of a Roman army, even a battered one, prevents the columns from separating too much, which limits the damage to some degree.

In many areas, the Ottomans carry off not just property but people. As Iskandar’s forces withdraw, having no desire to winter in eastern Anatolia, they carry off with them columns of captives. Iskandar has several reasons for this. Firstly, a depopulated area will not rebound until a new population arrives; this is a good way to keep Theophilos from recovering anytime soon.

Some of the captives, however, end up returning. On the border between Roman and Ottoman territory, Iskandar releases some of the captives. This does not presage a sudden change of heart, but rather a dose of cold strategy. The captives naturally want to return to their homes, but economic and agricultural cycles have been completely disrupted. They are unable to sustain themselves with nonexistent resources, making them reliant on government aid.

The Roman government in Armeniakon cannot ignore their plight without catastrophic consequences for public morale, but any resources dedicated to the refugees are resources unavailable for rebuilding armed strength in the ravaged regions. This strategy is not new; Herakleios I had used this tactic against the Sassanids in the last great Roman-Sassanid war a thousand years earlier and it is almost certain the Shah got the idea from reading Roman histories of said war.

The returnees make up a minority of the original captives. Iskandar takes the rest and settles them throughout the eastern portions of his empire. They represent additional farmers and artisans, valuable resources particularly in the eastern stretches, lightly populated and mostly with nomads. Placed in new sites to develop wastelands and guard communication routes, they develop new communities to replace the ones from which they’d been torn.

A bit of whimsy enters the process, possibly from Iskandar and possibly from the settlers, or from both, for this too is not new. Two thousand years ago, Greek-speaking colonists had been settled in these lands. The biggest and most vibrant of these communities, which survives and prospers to this day, speaking a unique variant of Greek of eastern Anatolian origins, is known as Alexandria-on-the-Oxus.

[1] OTL Northwest Iran, plus neighboring areas of Turkey, Armenia, and Azerbaijan.
 
Good update and nice to see Iskandar both reads and appreciates history. While he prefers that Sophia's faction wins, he understands that any overt support would damage her politically. Thus he just needs to guide his efforts into clearly inadvertent support.
 
Iskandar has not been idle since the treaty with Sarantenos, and any attack against the Tourmarches' themes will surely aid Sophia's faction, even if they're not coordinating with each other. While the Mesopotamian officials are chafing under his rule, it's possible that he can successfully placate them and make them a part of the Ottoman Empire proper.

He might honestly be the biggest winner out of this entire mess of a conflict and I think it is deserved after what he went through during the War of Wrath only to see that peace be ripped apart in front of his eyes.

A bit of whimsy enters the process, possibly from Iskandar and possibly from the settlers, or from both, for this too is not new. Two thousand years ago, Greek-speaking colonists had been settled in these lands. The biggest and most vibrant of these communities, which survives and prospers to this day, speaking a unique variant of Greek of eastern Anatolian origins, is known as Alexandria-on-the-Oxus.
Very surprised to see Greek communities in Central Asia be revitalized after being lost to cultural assimilation.
 
Since Poland has regained some of its mojo, did a version of OTL's Union of Brest (Orthodox-Catholic union of churches) occur?

Very surprised to see Greek communities in Central Asia be revitalized after being lost to cultural assimilation.
All we need now is Greek Massalia to come full circle
 
The biggest and most vibrant of these communities, which survives and prospers to this day, speaking a unique variant of Greek of eastern Anatolian origins, is known as Alexandria-on-the-Oxus
It would have been even funnier if he decided to pull another "Better than Antioch, Khosrow built this" he being a history buff and all.
 
Top