I recently learned about Nickajack, a historical region straddling the eastern part of the Alabama-Tennessee that was historically known for its opposition to the Confederacy. Like West Virginia--indeed, like Appalachia in the South generally--the region's population seems to have been composed mainly of whites uninvested in the slavery-centered economies of lowland regions. Resistance to the Confederacy in the region rose to the point of armed revolt, even.
The main difference between Nickajack and West Virginia seems to be that, unlike that state with its easy access from Ohio and Pennsyulvania, Nickajack was a region surrounded by the South. Wheeling could be supported in its bid for separation, but (say) Knoxville could not.
Could Nickajack have been viable? One problem that I see is that if you do have a Union that is strong enough to support a bid for Nickajack statehood, you also have a Union that might be able to crush the South quickly enough that Nickajack separatism will not come up.
Thoughts?
The main difference between Nickajack and West Virginia seems to be that, unlike that state with its easy access from Ohio and Pennsyulvania, Nickajack was a region surrounded by the South. Wheeling could be supported in its bid for separation, but (say) Knoxville could not.
Could Nickajack have been viable? One problem that I see is that if you do have a Union that is strong enough to support a bid for Nickajack statehood, you also have a Union that might be able to crush the South quickly enough that Nickajack separatism will not come up.
Thoughts?