No Ides of March

What happens if Caesar gets himself some bodyguards who fight off his assassins?

Does he go East to fight the Parthians? Does Rome stay loyal to him when he is gone?

What if he loses to the Parthians?

Does he afterall accept the title "Rex" and become absolute leader? Would he have completely abolished the senate or kept it as it was already becoming, a rubber-stamp institution?
 
What happens if Caesar gets himself some bodyguards who fight off his assassins?

Probably outside of his character, from what we can tell. Still, it's easy to imagine him surviving the assassination attempt somehow or other.

Does he go East to fight the Parthians? Does Rome stay loyal to him when he is gone?

Depends what allies he leaves behind, really. And how successful he is. Victory is a good antidote to domestic strife, sometimes.

What if he loses to the Parthians?

Then he's screwed, to use a technical term.

Does he afterall accept the title "Rex" and become absolute leader? Would he have completely abolished the senate or kept it as it was already becoming, a rubber-stamp institution?

No matter how much power he acquires, I suspect the Senate stays. It had a lot of prestige. It even endured in the Byzantine Empire for an awful long time, even if it was mostly a symbol. Easier for Caesar to bend the Senate to his will than to abolish it.
 

Philip

Donor
What happens if Caesar gets himself some bodyguards who fight off his assassins?

Discovering the plot seems more likely.

Does he go East to fight the Parthians?

Possibly, but doubtful. There are other options. He could return to Britannia or Germania. He could go to Dacia. I think that would be my choice. Dacia was a threat to Rome. They held valuable land around the Danube. Plus, they sided with Pompey. Oh, and he was planning to send legions there when he was assassinated.

Does Rome stay loyal to him when he is gone?

Hard to say. IICR, he intended to remain in Rome but send the legions.

What if he loses to the Parthians?

Assuming he survives the Parthians? Doubtful he would make it back to Rome alive.

Does he afterall accept the title "Rex" and become absolute leader? Would he have completely abolished the senate or kept it as it was already becoming, a rubber-stamp institution?

Senate definitely stays.
 
AFAIK he had planned to fight the Parthians, then go around the Black Sea (taking [Trans]Caucasus countries, Crimea, Dacia), and return to Germania from the east.
 
AFAIK he had planned to fight the Parthians, then go around the Black Sea (taking [Trans]Caucasus countries, Crimea, Dacia), and return to Germania from the east.

Yeeah, Caesar was nothing of not ambitious.

The legions were already moving East when he was killed. And Caesar would have definately lead them, no chance he would let anyone else get into a powerful position. Although Mark Anthony would probably be reliable enough.
 
If Caesar was killed in the Parthian wars then Marc Antony would have succeded him as Dictator Perpetuus without any troubles or Octavian bothering him to claim his uncle's inheritance... (it was Mark Anyony's right to succed as Dictator in case of Caesar's death... he was his Magister Equituum...)
 
What happens if Caesar gets himself some bodyguards who fight off his assassins?
Caesar had Good bodyguards. that day He ordered them to remain outside, and not accomply him into the Senate chambers.
Discovering the plot seems more likely.
There is some evidence that he knew of the plot, and that is why He left the body guards outside.

In other words Caeser comitted Sucide, by Assasination.
 
What happens if Caesar gets himself some bodyguards who fight off his assassins?

Does he go East to fight the Parthians? Does Rome stay loyal to him when he is gone?

What if he loses to the Parthians?

Does he afterall accept the title "Rex" and become absolute leader? Would he have completely abolished the senate or kept it as it was already becoming, a rubber-stamp institution?

I will try to answer these questions as best I can, mostly based of the Lecture I recently got done with from my Latin class, which, thankfully, we also learn about Roman history in as well.

1) Caesar had bodyguards, the Lictors. They followed him everywhere and he had plenty of them at his house. However, pre-assassination, many people did see him moving over to "tyrant," so, he ordered his Lictors to stay away, kind of as a gesture of faith towards the people of Rome, something to do with "A Freeman who walks among other Free people has nothing to fear," he wanted to show the Roman people that he was their equal, no worse, no better. Had he brought his Lictors with him to that meeting with the Senators, they probably would have all been caught and executed or possibly have aborted the assassination, seeing it would fail out right and plan to try to assassinate him another day.

2) He would have. Caesar had already prepared a massive, three year campaign that he would leave for at the end of March. He would subjugate the Parthians, move north, through modern day Ukraine, and end up trying to conquer Germania. Would he have succeeded or ended up like his buddy Crassus and be sipping molten gold at the force of Parthian captors? We'll never know.

3) See last statement.

4) He eventually would have. Caesar was a power hungry leader and if he could have become the sole ruler of the Republic, he would have taken it. However, he probably would not have used the title "Rex" (Latin for King, btw) as Rome has had a bad history with Rexs, he probably would have liked to take a different title, "Dictator for Life," maybe "Emperor," as his adopted son and grand nephew will a few decades after his death. Its not a question of whether or not he would abolish the Senate, he couldn't have. The Senate had been part of Rome since the earliest days of the Republic, its Senators were the oldest, wisest, and, in many cases, richest men in Rome. While Caesar was probably one of, if not the finest military commander of the classical era, but he would not be able to hold off ALL of the Senators of Rome, who could hire Rome's enemies to overthrow Caesar. He would accept his title as ruler of Rome, but he would have to keep the Senate intact, the best he could do is limit its power. Overtime, however, he and his successors could force the Senate into the same power it had during the Empire, basically there for show.
 

Hapsburg

Banned
The problem with Caesar becoming "Emperor" is that the position of Roman Emperor itself was very abstract and complex, and was never a single office or title. It was a combination of various titles, offices, honours, and powers that were coalesced into one individual. "Imperator" just became the most common slang for the position because it rolled off the tongue a lot better than the other titles, and it was one of the few constant powers they held. Over the course of the Imperial period, the Emperors lost the offices and titles of Princeps Senatus, Pontifex Maximus, Dominus, Consul, etc. If they had kept the Princeps Senatus position all throughout, we would probably be calling the guys "Roman Princes" rather than "Roman Emperors".

Perpetual Dictator seems far more likely a position for Caesar to take, along with the various positions the OTL Emperors collected along the way. As long as he keeps a puppet senate in place as a rubber-stamp, he's assured the popularity and support of the plebeian proletariat, the eventual bourgeois merchantry (perhaps you could call the equestrian class a proto-burgher class?), and the rich patricians.
 
Top