Over at Quora, last week I answered a question. Why wasn't France partitioned among the Allies after the Napoleonic War? There were some obvious seams, even within the pre-1790 borders: Alsace might well have been brought back into the orbit of Germany, while French Flanders could have plausibly been added to the United Netherlands. A Spanish Roussillon, even, perhaps more? Maybe France itself might have been radically decentralized, so as to never pose a threat to its neighbours again.
Below is one sketch of one partition proposal, FYI.
In my answer, I concluded that, even after the second defeat of Napoleon in 1815, the other powers of Europe did not want to create an obvious power vacuum in Europe. Reducing the most powerful country in Europe to a low point would have created a power vacuum and the certainty of future instability. None of the statesmen wanted to risk a new round of French wars.
Could this have happened somehow? Maybe. What if Napoleon was able to outlast Waterloo, at least long enough to make the Allies think France would need to be radically diminished?
Thoughts?
Below is one sketch of one partition proposal, FYI.
In my answer, I concluded that, even after the second defeat of Napoleon in 1815, the other powers of Europe did not want to create an obvious power vacuum in Europe. Reducing the most powerful country in Europe to a low point would have created a power vacuum and the certainty of future instability. None of the statesmen wanted to risk a new round of French wars.
Could this have happened somehow? Maybe. What if Napoleon was able to outlast Waterloo, at least long enough to make the Allies think France would need to be radically diminished?
Thoughts?
Last edited: