Worst miltary commander

Vertriculin

I thought i might do a questionaire

Who was your worst miltary commander of the 20th century?

you can send in your opinions of who and why they were terrible. Also if they could have been replaced or would you replace them with?

It can be from any country.
 

Darkling

Calgacus said:
Buller must be a candidate.
Click to expand...

No he mustn't.

Buller's problem was made entirely by White being insubordinate and staying north of Tugela.

Had White done as ordered Buller would have won the war with ease and unlike Bobs he wouldn't have concentrated on taking territory instead of capturing the Boers (which he correctly warned would lead to Guerilla warfare).

Even after Bobs was put in charge Buller was left fighting WW1 (in essence) and invented the creeping barrage after a few months, it took his successors in France a decade later a good while longer and a few 10,000s of lives more.

Add in the fact that he won a VC, was a technophile (pioneering the use of steam tractors in warfare) and didn't need to look up "logistics" (unlike Bobs and his ideological offspring) and we find Britain would have been blessed to have had him on hand during ww1.
 
Michel Van

Michel Van

Calgacus said:
Buller must be a candidate.

Also Hitler maybe?
Click to expand...

Adolf Hitler IS the worst miltary commander of the 20th century
maybe the Worst of Wordhistory !

after winter 1941 Hitler take Personaly the Miltary Command

Lucky for us, he had NO sense for Miltary Strategy and think in WWI tatik
in World of Blitzkrieg....

wat you want ?
he was a good Artpainter with one on insanity persistent.
 

merlin

Howabout 'Percival' of Singapore?

It may stretch the defination of 'Military Commander' but anybody for including Hugh Trenchard?
Long thought of, as the founding father of the RAF. But was his obsession with strategic bombing, really an advantage for the RAF and Britain? The RAF certainly would not have had enough fighter squadrons if he had his way! He wanted an 'independant airforce' but independant of what!
 

Abdul Hadi Pasha

Banned
merlin said:
Howabout 'Percival' of Singapore?

It may stretch the defination of 'Military Commander' but anybody for including Hugh Trenchard?
Long thought of, as the founding father of the RAF. But was his obsession with strategic bombing, really an advantage for the RAF and Britain? The RAF certainly would not have had enough fighter squadrons if he had his way! He wanted an 'independant airforce' but independant of what!
Click to expand...

I vote for Percival. I'm not sure anyone else has ever lost a defensive battle entrenched on an Island while in supply before or since. Refusing to fortify the landward side for morale reasons has to be the most singly stupid justification of incompetence, ever.
 

Grimm Reaper

Buller was indeed the victim of circumstances far outside his control, nor did I notice his successor, with 2 years and vastly greater resources, wind things up quickly.
 

maverick

Banned
Max Sinister said:
That's not true what you said about Hitler. His painting wasn't that good either.
Click to expand...

Actually, he made several good decisions in 1940, especially by ignoring the olde prussian staff and listening to Von Manstein and the new generation that didn't want to fight the french with 1871 tactics...:p

Gamelin too.
 

Ibn Warraq

Banned
I think Nasser, based on the way he allowed his air force to be wiped out by the Israelis during the Six Day War while it was still on the ground.
 

LightInfa

Ibn Warraq said:
I think Nasser, based on the way he allowed his air force to be wiped out by the Israelis during the Six Day War while it was still on the ground.
Click to expand...

I think the fault mainly lies with the guy he appointed to command his military (I can't remember the name, something like Amer). That guy also panicked once the Israeli army began its ground offensive and he ordered the retreat of the Egyptian Army from Sinai.
 

Peter Cowan

Well, there are a fair number of candidates other than those already mentioned

Rennenkampf / Samsonov in East Prussia 1914

Conrad - lost big time to the Russians in 1914

Corap and Huntziger - France 1940

Budenny - SU 1941

Saddam Hussein - GW1 and 2

Galtieri / Menendez - Falklands 1982
 

Calgacus

Varus?
Mark Clark?
James IV of Scotland?
Charles Edward Stuart (Bonnie Prince Charlie)?
Custer?
Burnside?
Banks?
 

LightInfa

Calgacus said:
Varus?
Mark Clark?
James IV of Scotland?
Charles Edward Stuart (Bonnie Prince Charlie)?
Custer?
Burnside?
Banks?
Click to expand...

I don't think Burnside should be counted. He never wanted the command of the Army of the Potomac, and he knew he wasn't qualified for it. Lincoln insisted, so he got the job. His plan to fight the Confederate Army while it was divided might have worked, but he had to wait for pontoon bridges and by that time, Jackson had linked up with Lee.
 

Calgacus

Peter Cowan said:
Well, there are a fair number of candidates other than those already mentioned

Rennenkampf / Samsonov in East Prussia 1914

Conrad - lost big time to the Russians in 1914

Corap and Huntziger - France 1940

Budenny - SU 1941

Saddam Hussein - GW1 and 2

Galtieri / Menendez - Falklands 1982
Click to expand...

I think you mean Hotzendorf.

Special mention also goes to Cadorna...
 

Calgacus

LightInfa said:
I don't think Burnside should be counted. He never wanted the command of the Army of the Potomac, and he knew he wasn't qualified for it. Lincoln insisted, so he got the job. His plan to fight the Confederate Army while it was divided might have worked, but he had to wait for pontoon bridges and by that time, Jackson had linked up with Lee.
Click to expand...

Whether he wanted to or not is immaterial, and Fredericksburg is a military folly all of its own.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top
Top