So Prussia is intervening on Austria's side against France?
Oh boy. Big doings are afoot.
Prussia and the rest of the German States could be the deciding factor against France and Italy. Earlier German unification perhaps?
So Prussia is intervening on Austria's side against France?
Oh boy. Big doings are afoot.
Prussia and the rest of the German States could be the deciding factor against France and Italy. Earlier German unification perhaps?
So Prussia is intervening on Austria's side against France?
Oh boy. Big doings are afoot.
Tongera
Possibly but Austria's already badly trashed and Prussia isn't the military titan it was a decade or so later OTL. Hence a war with both France and Russia, even with the support of Britain and the smaller German states could be very nasty for it. Apart from the fact there are a few hints of potential problems in N Amercia.
Steve
yboxman
Bloody hell. I didn't think Molke and Bismarck would go that far. They might get away with this if they quietly advise France and/or Russia, possibly especially the latter, their not going to content their existing gains at Austrian expense. However its going to kick up a storm as basically a military coup against every other German states in the north. Also it might well cause concern in Britain. Not to mention if this isn't going to be permanent, which I presume it is from the dictated at gunpoint constitution, Prussia has made a hell of a lot of enemies.
One typo I think. I presume [ex?] king George is asking whether the Prussians are going to make a declaration of war against Hanover rather Prussia?
Steve
As to whether the king of Hanover (and Hesse and Saxony and a few other minor states) have just lost their thrones... that depends on how well they cooperate. Their cooperation helps switch the alleigance of their trrops quickly on the short term but on the long term an "independent" Saxony, Hanover, etc are an expensive administrative headache and a potential weak spot in a prolonged war. However, Prussia needs their troops NOW in order to deter France and Russia and if they give their word they can keep their thrones they will lose major credibility if they violate it (much of the Frankfort diet manuevers before the "night of long bayonets" is made in order to provide a legal pretext for the takeover)
yboxman
The basic problem here is that Prussia has shown its own word is worthless and breached the rules of the German Confederation. Hence if the assorted rulers 'agree' to Prussian control to keep their thrones the fact this has been forced at gunpoint means that neither they nor anyone else will expect them to be morally bound.
Steve
True it will be difficult to get out from under the Prussian boot but Bismarck could well find himself in the same position as Napoleon a couple of generations back. Relying on increasing military strength to keep his victims off his back, that same strength and the tactics and finances needed to maintain it making the populations increasingly resentful.
August 27th 22:30, Kingdom of Hanover, City of Hanover
King George the Ist receives the Prussian ambassador into his personal quarters an outraged expression on his face. "What is the meaning of this outrage!" he demands of the rather pudgy uniformed man facing him (what is it, he wonders, which leads every Prussian serviceman to don a military uniform and rank, however indistinguished, under almost every possible circumstance).
I think this entire passage needs to be rewritten. This should be King George V (who was King of Hanover at the time of the POD and at this point 2 years later.) He was also totally blind!
yboxman
I think things are really coming to a head. Probably Russia would be best off seeing if Austria would make a deal. Recognising Hungary and Russian gains further east. If they offer the Austrians something in return they might accept as the situation is rather perilous for them and also it would give them a chance to recover without becoming totally dependent on Prussia.
Steve
However I think you mentioned the alliance with France makes this politically difficult.
Also that's a decision that would have to be made in St Petersburg, which is a long way away and probably has little understanding of the situation on the ground.
Steve
Milyutin could and it sounds like he will make a bid for Bratislava but he realises that unless he's able to break the Austrian army they can simply retire towards Vienna and he can only follow them by risking a wider war. On the other hand if he fails, while the Austrians don't have a lot to counter-attack with the Russian forces are rather stretched so he could end up having serious problems.
I just did some research on this. It seems that Sweden was connected to Denmark at this point, but the first line connecting to Finland (and thus Russia) wasn't opened until 1860.But If Prussia imposes a telegram blackout how long does it take messages to bounce back between France and Russia? Is there any underwater cable connecting Sweden with Russia? With Denmark?
I just did some research on this. It seems that Sweden was connected to Denmark at this point, but the first line connecting to Finland (and thus Russia) wasn't opened until 1860.
Then assuming no delays in transition the quickest system would be telegram from Paris to Amsterdam>dispatch boat to Copenhagan> Telegram to Stockholm>Dispatch boat to Finland>Telegram to St Petersburg.
While Sweden was just switching from the semaphore system to telegram at the time, the Russian authorities were still using the semaphore for communications from Western Finland to Russia proper - in fact the line had just been extended to Turku an Uusikaupunki following the Crimean War. The first telegram line had opened in Finland between Helsinki and St. Petersburg in 1855, but I believe it was not operational in 1859 as it had been discontinued following the Crimean War. Regular mail travelled between Turku and St. Petersburg twice or thrice a week.
In theory the communication from Stockholm to St. Petersburg might have gone fully through the semaphore, as the old Swedish system might still be used up to the Ålands. Short googling has not yet revealed it to me how the Swedish and Russian semaphore systems "interfaced" with each other in the 1850s - if I was at work I could check our library and have a better answer for you.
The message might then still have to go by steam boat between Stockholm and the Ålands and/or the Ålands and Turku. Steam ships such as the Furst Menschikoff ran between Stockholm and Turku regularly at least once or twice a week - that might still have been the fastest connection available. A timetable from late 1858 below.
And as you might notice, for that ship at least the route would be suspended in late October because of the onset of winter. In winter the messages would have to travel across the frozen Baltic on a horse-drawn sleigh, and that would take a bit more time. In between open and frozen sea there was the period of "broken conditions" coinciding with what the Russians call rasputitsa when there was too much ice for the ships to operate and too little to run across by sleigh: during that time it would take a lot longer to get a message across.
The first steel-hulled ships specifically designed to be capable of breaking the ice and to operate around the year were taken into use on the route during the 1890s.
During the summer-autumn months I believe an official message sent via Stockholm might reach St. Petersburg in a single day, assuming the semaphore could be used the whole way, or it might take up to a maximum of a week, say, if it has to go by steam ship to Turku and then by mail rider to the imperial capital. The safest answer, IMO, would be somewhere in between the two options for this particular stretch.