Sigurd just took the Varangian Guard....like a boss.
This is getting very interesting indeed. Even without further conquests, Sigurd now has the potential to make Palma Mallorca the commercial and financial equal of Genoa or Venice. Ownership of Crete and Rhodes. The right to trade freely in the Eastern Roman Empire. Ownership of Tyre and Sidon, two ports into which the trade of the East pours. And something tells me that Sigurd is not done yet.
The capture of Damascus as well as Aleppo is very important TTL. It gives the Crusaders a fighting chance to hold off Saladin (though it would have been great if the Crusaders had taken Bostra and Palmyra and El Rakkah as well). Maybe ITTL the Crusaders can hold off the Sunni Ayyubids, perhaps with the help of the Shia Fatamids who rule Egypt. If so, Ismaili Shia Islam is likely to persist in Egypt and Egypt remain a much more liberal place than OTTL.
One thing that could get very interesting might be if some of Sigurd's Vikings manage to go a viking on a trading expedition down the Red Sea and across the Indian Ocean to India and back. The combination of humid desert heat, crosswinds and lack of places onshore to find water for rowers make the Red Sea a challenging place for rowing ships but Viking knarrs might be able to make it to the Bab al Mandeb and beyond--if they can get their knarrs shipped across either the Isthmus of Suez or to the Gulf of Aqabah.
In the North Atlantic they remained Free Men though those would be regarded as petty nobility in Europe as they to a great extend were Norwegian chieftains etc. squeezed out when Saint Olaf were converting his country to christianity.
In Iceland they formed a republic.
Early writing may have been runic on birchbark but the conditions are bad for preservation. Later writing were Latin done by clergy or somebody trained by such.
According to Danish law men would inherit on an equal basis women inherit half of that.
Two sons and two daughers would then split the inheritance in three parts one of these split in two for the daughters.
Don't expect the crown to be divided this way; that would pass to - in this case as Sigurd is a Norwegian - his oldest son.
Pretty soon we will need a map to see Sigurd's new domain in it's full glory
Hey, it's been a while since I checked the thread last. Sorry, but to answer the author's questions.
I've read there were about 8,000 Normans in all (not 100% sure of this estimate) and intermarriage did happen frequently but notably the fusion of cultures is less and slower than might be commonly thought. As for the Greek relationship with Byzantium, I don't know about that one. Sorry. I do know that the Normans at least did patronize and construct orthodox churches in Southern Italy, especially where there was a heavy Greek presence like Bari.
As for the TL, it's great I'm just surprised that anyone could sucker John Comnenos like that.
Thanks, most appreciated.
I wonder if runic was ever set to parchment, books, or was it restricted to birchbark and monuments etc?
Interesting you'd mention that inheritance law, I had come across that same information, but relating to Norway and the incessant squabbling over the succession in this period. Basically since the Kings (once the country was unified) considered the entire Kingdom as their personal property, and since sons (both legitimate and illegitimate) were entitled to equal parts, the Kingdom was liable to division among all the King's sons and even foreign men who showed up claiming royal paternity (provided they survived ordeals by fire etc). Of course the church intervened advocating legitimate inheritors by primogeniture, not long after this TL's start (which I think is probably the period you have in mind).
Fantastic, some very interesting points. I've been trying to figure out how the Norwegians would fare initially - I'm guessing they'd have to pick up the Lingua Franca in order to deal with the Catalans, Arabs and Italians about them. I'm not sure whether Balearic Norse could ever come to replace the Lingua Franca, or simply mold/influence it in some way. What you say makes plenty sense - I imagine most men would be killed or enslaved, while the womenfolk would be put to work and breed by/with the Norsemen. Before long a new generation speaking a hybrid Norse-Arabic (assuming a Moor majority prior to conquest) tongue.
Interesting point on the thralls, I wasn't aware of that. What I was going for was a tiered caste system, with unbelievers at the very bottom, liable to any sort of abuse or treatment (primarily thinking of rape/beatings initially and being sold at slave markets afterward), while those who convert have a more privileged reality - assured housing and food with the possibility of ascension, even marriage and property of their own, etc. Perhaps they might be called "churls", automatically bound (in a way similar to Roman freedmen) to the King and/or the chieftain they are assigned to.
During Medieval times runic script had a renaisance; Scanian Law was written in runic on parchment. Usually though Latin was used for official documents.
You have to divide this into two; a) general inheritance law and b) the Kingdom.
a) would be used for settlement of the inheritance i.e. the lands, buildings, cattle, etc.
b) in Norway the Kings first son was his successor by inheriting the crown; in Denmark the King would be chosen among the able males of the royal line. I haven't come across dividing the lands among the heirs; to me it seems the Norwegian or Danish lands were one thing - a Kings personal demesne another. You shouldn't use the Frankish practice of dividing the lands in a Nordic context.
The nobility will likely be bilingual in the local mainland Romance Lingua Franca, but there really little need for the common Norseman to speak anything other than Norse and a local merchant pidgin. As for mixing with Arabic, I think it's unlikely, while they will have taken local slave wives/concubines, without the continues interaction with a native Arab speaking population, they will keep speaking Norse, simply because it will be the language of free men. There will be a few læoan words, but it will mostly for thing which didn't exiast in Norse already.
The Norse didn't really abuse their thralls any more than people abuse their servants, dogs, wives or children. Yes female thralls was often concubines, but if someone other than their master tried to rape them, it would be major faux pas, and the relationship between a female thrall and her master was more like a second wife in a Islamic household (historical), she was subservant to the first wife and while she could not say no to her husband, if he wanted sex, most sex was at least semi-consensual (as most marital sex were historical).
Excellent.
How are Byzantine-Viking relations going to be? Also, Map please?
So Caesaropapism is re-institutionalized in the West and celibacy has become optional.
Very interesting turn of events indeed.
I guess the main example of dividing lands (and the crown) between heirs was Sigurd himself, alongside his brothers Eystein and Olaf. Later on when others appeared claiming to be their bastard half-brothers, they also claimed a share in the crown (Harald Gille successfully, Sigurd Slembe unsuccessfully).