While it would definitely help in the long run but for now we're mainly focusing mainly in Eurasia since we're still rebuilding and modernizing our nation and we already have Stalin there keeping the rebels in a more organized and well trained along suppling them, of course it's only in the Caribbean and Central America (minus Panama since that would make the US start being aggressive) but we can support South America's socialist/communist rebels thru Brazil once the "Brazilian communist uprising" in 1935 succeeds.So, I've been thinking it over, should the USA be given ''Poland'' status for a while?
By that I fear that while the USA is and will be a great foe as a capitalist nation I think they would be a far greater revolutionary rival given the current disparity between the USSR and them. However using the fear of the USA will gain us many socialist allies in South America.
Indeed, so maybe concealing our involvement in South America would be wisest?So, I've been thinking it over, should the USA be given ''Poland'' status for a while?
By that I fear that while the USA is and will be a great foe as a capitalist nation I think they would be a far greater revolutionary rival given the current disparity between the USSR and them. However using the fear of the USA will gain us many socialist allies in South America.
True with China somewhat Left-leaning "secured" Europe should be the main target, as it is also is the main route of potential attacks, dangers and ou main ideological enemies in the world in opposition to us right now with fascism and nationalism on the rise in the baltics, Balcan and other places there.While it would definitely help in the long run but for now we're mainly focusing mainly in Eurasia since we're still rebuilding and modernizing our nation and we already have Stalin there keeping the rebels in a more organized and well trained along suppling them, of course it's only in the Caribbean and Central America (minus Panama since that would make the US start being aggressive) but we can support South America's socialist/communist rebels thru Brazil once the "Brazilian communist uprising" in 1935 succeeds.
*Also we don't want to alienate the US too soon since we're gonna have a common enemy from Japan and some other far-right nation like Italy, some of the Balkan States, and/or Poland since we're supporting a socialist and social democrat in Germany.
Defiently a field day for Japanese Socialists and Communist to preach for true democracy and republicanism while the Army tries to dismantle it, but also dangerous as they might crack down on them harder then most in Europe would (with the exception of Italy or other fascist and nationalist governments there maybe).Again sorry for double posting...
I just remembered about the "February 26 Incident" that attempted to* replace Hirohito with his younger brother, Prince Chichibu who wanted complete imperial rule. We could use that to increase more support against the monarchy and corrupted government.
While dangerous to be sure but cracking down harder would also increase anti-Imperial and anti-war sentiment on the home island especially once the US nukes them (if/when they have them ready). Also I'm thinking that making Japan become pro-Soviet would help keep our influence in both Asia and the Pacific.Defiently a field day for Japanese Socialists and Communist to preach for true democracy and republicanism while the Army tries to dismantle it, but also dangerous as they might crack down on them harder then most in Europe would (with the exception of Italy or other fascist and nationalist governments there maybe).
But who would be best for the job and wouldn't that be problematic for anti-monarchist elements wich are very strong after the Civil War?I think we should form a "socialist-monarch" so we aren't viewed as a nation that's anti-monarch in Scandinavia and the Balkans.
*Removed some comments.
Well... we could use someone from Scandinavia who could create it.But who would be ebst for the job and wouldn't that be problematic for anti-monarchist elements wich are very strong after the Civil War?
Given the revolution was against the monarch, who lost is air of unpartial father of the state close to the Soviet revolution and the many many lives lost in the Civil War, I'd be very very uncertain that is a feasible option. And inviting a foreigner makes it even worse.Well... we could use someone from Scandinavia who could create it.
Well... we don't have to invite them, just reduce western power in Scandinavia while staying neutral once the Cold War begins.Given the revolution was against the monarch, who lost is air of unpartial father of the state close to the Soviet revolution and the many many lives lost in the Civil War, I'd be very very uncertain that is a feasible option. And inviting a foreigner makes it even worse.
Id say yes. Editing your first post and adding the new idea, won't change anything for the negative. But ymmvIdk if this still counts as a double post
Ok, thanks.Id say yes. Editing your first post and adding the new idea, won't change anything for the negative. But ymmv
B - surely all of the people of Poland and Lithuania must be liberated from their oppressors, not merely the White Russians and Ukrainians.Poland and Lithuania:
A) encourage White Russian and Ukrainian uprisings.
B) find other ways of internal opposition and regime change.
C) let us wait for now, Poland-Lithuania and Europe are not that important.
B, but allow for incorporation if this is the will of the Mongolian People.Incorporating the Mongolian SSR:
A) yes we need to absorb Mongolia, before the Chinese can do it themselves.
B) a depending Mongolia, guided internally and externally by us is enough.
C) support a neutral Mongolian nation state
D) let the Chinese retake Mongolia if they wish to do so