That’s definitely pretty interesting! The breaking of regional powers would definitely be of benefit, but I still think the Danes would likely need some buy in from some sector of the nobility as well, since they would likely play a role in the political affairs of the kingdom. There definitely seem to be ways to bring about a restoration of the Union, but it’s still unlikely to happen anytime soon, as Christian II will have to stabilize his rule in Denmark, deal with the Jutish nobility as well as the religious questions. He’s not in any position to start any foreign expeditions.
Hmm, they likely do. Some of the nobility was reform friendly as well, so they should be on side and maybe Christian’s earlier downfall, imprisonment and his son will temper his more radical beliefs? The otl Dacke war also didn’t happen until the early 1540s so still some years from where we are in the story. That should maybe give Denmark-Norway more time to stabilize
England can certainly offer assistance, but I’m not sure if they’ll want to be the Danish monarchy’s piggy bank in the long term. It’ll only be a reminder of what John’s role was originally supposed to be and what it’s changed into—and further the belief that England’s resources are being wasted abroad. I don’t think any sort of trade treaty would be enough to make the English think it’s beneficial.
That is true, but reclaiming Sweden would likely be the last big one for a while hopefully. And they could potentially play the “this will also be land ruled by your king and queen’s descendants” card. Also, it will give Mary the opportunity to ship off John again once they’ve done their duties in the marriage bed once again
 
Addendum: Map of Europe, 1536
Thought this might be of interest to people, so here is a map of Europe c. ~1536, following Christian II's restoration. Doesn't follow any traditional color scheme, just used colors from schemes I liked for certain countries. Darker shades (such as French Milan, or Danish Norway, Lithuania, ect) use 'dominion' coloring to present territories held outside the main crown / personal unions. Lighter shades (such as Genoa, Asti) use 'protectorate' coloring to represent territories where influence of a certain nation is paramount.

Used a 1500 map as a base, so boundaries / borders are to the best of my knowledge, and especially in France with Navarrese fiefs and Ireland with the various chiefdoms are likely not super accurate, but give a general idea. In France, aside from the Navarrese fiefs, the holdings of the House of Bourbon are shown as well, now held by François, the son of the Duke of Bourbon.

Europe - 1536 Finished.png
 
Darker shades (such as French Milan, or Danish Norway, Lithuania, ect) use 'dominion' coloring to present territories held outside the main crown / personal unions. Lighter shades (such as Genoa, Asti) use 'protectorate' coloring to represent territories where influence of a certain nation is paramount.
Nice to see that those turks finally got conquered by our glorious Almoravid Russia!
 
So will their be a rematch with France I don't see any kingdoms in Europe would want an over powerful France which has the largest population Europe
 
So will their be a rematch with France I don't see any kingdoms in Europe would want an over powerful France which has the largest population Europe
Yes, and very soon.

The last war between François and Charles V ended in 1530, which included ratified the betrothal between the Dauphin and Isabella, Charles V's eldest daughter. The treaty stipulated that certain territories be ceded upon their marriage, which is likely to unfold in the next few years (1536-1537). Charles V is definitely going to refuse to cede said territories, and will probably spark the next conflict (on top of Italy, of course).
 
Yes, and very soon.

The last war between François and Charles V ended in 1530, which included ratified the betrothal between the Dauphin and Isabella, Charles V's eldest daughter. The treaty stipulated that certain territories be ceded upon their marriage, which is likely to unfold in the next few years (1536-1537). Charles V is definitely going to refuse to cede said territories, and will probably spark the next conflict (on top of Italy, of course).
I can already imagine some of the participants like the Low Countries, the Papacy(they always flip flop) and maybe some other Italian states, I imagine England would be weary to participating given they're already involved in Scandinavia and don't want to sink in money towards anything else while Spain could be tempted to join, especially if that meant regaining Naples but given that for now France basically has Italy held, it means that they would be able to focus more against the Low Countries than usual which could end up costing Charles V more than just simply ceding the territories but of course France will still have to deal with Spain in their southern flank but we'll have to see how that will work out, either way, I'm looking forward to what you will make!
 
Chapter 24. Discord Along the Danube
Chapter 24. Discord Along the Danube
1533-1535; Germany, Hungary & the Ottoman Empire.

“I am wholly resolved to help my brother—both because his need is so great and because the perils which threaten him place the whole of the Christendom at risk. I cannot and must not abandon him, not because of the position I occupy, or due to fraternal love—I must go to him because he is a good brother to me.”
— Ferdinand, Prince of Asturias; written to his wife, Isabella before his departure to Germany.


Music Accompaniment: Kirim'dan Gelirim

600px-Quaternion_Eagle_by_Jost_de_Negker.jpg

The Quaternion Eagle, Jost de Negler; c. 1510.

The Diet of Trier which closed in 1532 had ended with the summoning of a general council under the authority of the Holy Roman Empire. Termed a synod by Charles V, the Synod of Trier was set to open in April of 1533. While the action was widely applauded by the squabbling factions within the empire—the news of the synod provoked a strong reaction when it reached Rome. “Word has reached His Holiness of the planned council which you plan to host in Germany,” Cardinal Alessandro Piccolomini, cardinal-nephew to Pope Pius V wrote in a letter to the emperor. “Authority for such matters rests in the hands of the Pope—and the Pope alone; the bull Execrabalis declares that the Pope as Vicar of Christ is the final authority within our church.” The letter was worded strongly—but without teeth. Though Pius V opposed the idea of a council in Germany without his participation, he was not prepared to make an enemy out of the emperor by acting out of rashness. Better to wait and see—while urging those who sought a council to pay heed to the Council of Verona, which remained primarily attended by French and Italian prelates. The Council of Verona would be closed in the spring of 1533—and postponed indefinitely, without having accomplished a single thing. Europe’s Catholic monarchs—outside of King François, who fumed at Charles's rejection of his council—watched the events unfolding in Germany with great interest.

Meanwhile, the Ottoman army in Hungary, under the command of Sultan Suleiman himself spent the winter of 1532 into 1533 at Szentendre. To ensure there were no issues, King John had the population of the town expelled—even the local church was requisitioned, and its priests expelled—with Szentendre Church converted into a mosque during the duration of the Turkish stay. The army, which numbered some 100,000 men, required many supplies—with food being the most important. While the centralized structure of the Ottoman Empire meant that a great portion of the needed supplies could be procured within the empire and transported to Hungary, not everything could be provided on time throughout the winter—which meant that the burden then fell upon Hungary. “We have received another receipt from the Turks seeking supplies for the army garrisoned at Szetendre—our third this month,” István Werboczy wrote in a letter to John Zápolya. “They require flour and salt most especially—and are prepared to pay us a further inducement if we assist in providing them these provisions. The Grand Vizier has also written seeking our assistance in gathering supplies for the coming campaign season… including some 50,000 sheep to be slaughtered for meat; oxen and horses to replace those that have perished; and fodder and grains to feed the animals.” While the need for the Turkish army allowed the Hungarian crown to profit, the burden fell most heavily upon the Hungarian peasantry, with the crown ordering forced requisitions of needed supplies.

The Synod of Trier opened in April of 1533 in the presence of Charles V. Empress Renée also attended—heavily pregnant—she would give birth to her first child, a daughter named Anne in honor of her mother at Trier in June of 1533. The Catholic Party was represented by the Electors of Cologne, Mainz, and Trier as well as numerous Prince-Bishops and Prince-Archbishops. The Protestant Party were represented by their primary theologians—Martin Luther, and Philipp Melanchthon who represented the Lutheran school, while Martin Bucer and Wolfgang Capito attended as representatives of the Swabian Confession, prevalent in Alsace and portions of southern Germany. Mary of Austria sent representatives from Bohemia—this included not only Catholic theologians, such as Jan Dubravius but supporters of the Protestant movement and Ultraquists as well. Major Protestant princes also attended—with John Frederick, the Elector of Saxony, and Philip of Hesse also in attendance. Both groups were given equal time at the start of the synod to outline their beliefs and ideas—yet a tense atmosphere hung over the proceedings. Several Catholic prelates dramatically marched out of the Synod when Martin Luther in his opening speech attacked the abuses and corruption of the Papacy. “The Pope is and remains the anti-Christ,” Luther thundered from his pulpit. “He and his predecessors are liars—their domains were gained through both fraud and deception. Now, today, they continue to deceive, lying to all the Christendom; the Pope is above no one, from the greatest king to the meanest serf; Anyone armed with scripture can find salvation. there is no role for him here in Germany—it is us alone who can and should decide the future.” Protestant attendees proved just as disruptive; they heckled and jeered at the Prince-Bishop of Eichstätt when he attempted to give an impassioned defense of the Pope’s authority over the Catholic Church.“It was at Trier that Charles V realized that the Protestant faith was no mere passing fancy or minor heresy,” Francesco Guicciardini, a historian of the period wrote in one of his seminal works, Diario di Viaggio in Germania. “Grave divides separated the Catholic and Protestant faiths—it was not just theological disputes, but the disputes of their worldviews, too. How could the Catholics compromise with those who saw the head of their church as the anti-Christ? How could Protestants compromise with those who saw them as mischief-making heretics?”

400px-Augsburger-Reichstag.jpg

Woodcut of the Synod of Trier.


The Synod’s opening weeks were spent in discussion on theological issues, such as sacraments, clerical marriage, and communion for the laity. Very little progress was made, and most discussions devolved into fierce arguments—with neither side prepared to give ground in their beliefs. It was only in discussions regarding communion that some common ground was found, with Catholic prelates conceding that there was no real doctrinal reason to deny communion of both kinds to the laity. “The emperor was gravely disturbed at the arguments that prevailed in those early weeks of the Synod,” one attendee wrote in his private memoirs. “He had sincerely hoped that there might be some grounds for collaboration—but he found himself gravely disappointed.” With arguments and infighting continuing to paralyze the synod, Charles eventually ordered a separation of the Catholic and Protestant prelates. Catholics were given over the Abbey of St. Matthias to conduct their work, while the Protestants were given the Liebfrauenkirke—with the right to hold services there during their stay. The emperor provided both parties with imperial receipts; the receipts to the Catholics were primarily political questions such as: Does the emperor have the right to nominate appointments to benefices within the whole of the empire? Questions put towards the Protestant party included a mix of theological questions regarding their confessions which had been published at Regensburg, as well as political questions. Both sides were ordered to consider what had been put before them and to render answers before the emperor in a year. This marked a failure in the Synod of Trier as a vehicle for reconciliation between the Catholics and Protestants, but it transformed into one of imperial reform, which sought to reshape the emperor’s authority over the Catholic church within the whole of the empire.

It was while at Trier that Charles received news from Hungary, that the Turkish army under the command of the sultan was preparing to attack the remaining rebel strongholds within Hungary—Vasvár, Óvár, and Sopron—all of which would open the pathway into the empire through Austria. While the border had been reinforced in the year previously, it would matter little against the full might of the Ottoman Empire. With the Synod devolving into open dysfunction, Charles focused on the troubles that might soon visit the border. An agreement with the diet held the year previously allowed Charles to order a muster of the Reichsarmee, with the troops to be deployed into Austria. The diet had also agreed to a levying of the Türkenhilfe to provide the emperor with funds needed to defend the empire. They extended to Charles twenty-four Roman months’ worth of revenue—a sum totaling nearly ƒ2,000,000. Charles also endeavored to gain support from the Electors—both Louis V, Count Palatine of the Rhine, and Joachim II Hektor, the Elector of Brandenburg pledged support for the emperor’s defensive plans, while the Elector of Saxony remained aloof. Further support came from princes in the southern frontier, such as the Duke of Bavaria. By May 1533, the Turks had annihilated the rebel troops in Hungary and had seized the Hungarian fortifications that lay along the border. “Messengers have brought us news of your victory,” Queen Anna of Hungary wrote in a love note to John Zápolya. “We are gladdened that you are safe—but even more gladdened that those who oppose you have been crushed underfoot. The princesses, your daughters[1] are beyond thrilled—Anna and Mary both beg of stories of your travels—and Mary begs that you might consider her request for an Arabian horse… it is all she can think of since she saw the sultan’s mount. Little Catherine has been unwell, but little Elizabeth is well; I am in good spirits too, for I am enceinte once again. I hope and pray that I might give you the son that you so desperately desire… be sure that your kingdom is in the safest hands whilst you go abroad—and I shall protect it with my life.” Anna would give birth to her fifth child in November of 1533—another daughter, named Helena.

Suleiman, having crushed the Hungarian rebels, was now prepared fully to march on Germany—with Vienna, which served as a gateway upon the Danube River, as his goal. His army still numbered some 105,000 men—and included some 12,000 cavalrymen under the personal command of John Zápolya. The army remained remarkably well-provisioned thanks to Hungarian support, though rumors swirled of food shortages even in Hungary’s most prosperous region. In the southern counties, Slavonic peasants were stirred up by Marko Ševic, a Serbian military officer, who led a group of peasant rabble in a campaign of ravishment and plunder along the Ottoman-Hungarian border, targeting the lords and aghas upon both sides of the border. The summer of 1533 proved hotter and drier than in the year before, impacting the growing season. “The growing season of 1533 was particularly trying for our peasantry,” one magnate wrote in a letter to his grandson many years later, detailing the issues on their estate. “Many of our peasants lost livestock to the royal officials… the most prosperous lost both their oxen and many of their sheep. Some were unable to till their personal plots; others, having lost their sheep, lost valuable income from wool and milk. The heat of the summer proved even more deadly…withering and killing crops that had already struggled to grow in our pitiful spring… even we, ensconced within the manor house could not weather this storm without issue; our debts grew, and we were even forced to seek out a loan from the neighboring estate… your grandmother was even forced to pawn several of her most valuable jewels to a Jewish pawnbroker in Világos… she would never see the jewels again…”

400px-Janissary_Recruitment_in_the_Balkans-Suleymanname.jpg

Ottoman painting of Janissary Recruitment.

Turkish troops arrived in Pozsony in June—putting them some eighty miles from Vienna. It was at Pozsony that John Zápolya named his wife, Anna, as Regent of Hungary in his absence. His council was instructed to obey her as if her commands were spoken by him. Mary of Austria’s Hofmeister, Wilhelm von Roggendorf was placed in charge of the defense of Vienna by the emperor. Charles left Trier at the beginning of June—leaving Renée in Trier as she was due to give birth at any time. Charles traveled with a sizable retinue from Trier to Regensburg, which would become his base during the Turkish incursion into the empire. By the end of June, Turkish troops had reached the walls of Vienna, and the Siege of Vienna began. The great Turkish camp was pitched up outside of the walls of the city, with Suleiman ordering that his foragers despoil the surrounding countryside—both to provide his army with supplies and to deprive supplies to the Viennese. Suleiman soon discovered that the Austrians had acted before him—he found no grain or vegetables, but instead fallow fields where crops had been cut and trampled down—under the orders of Roggendorf, to deprive Suleiman of needed supplies. Though the dry summer weather had allowed Suleiman to bring forth the heavy siege guns that he would need to blast at Vienna’s walls, his army still suffered from several issues—the hot weather meant that water was in short supply, and the heat meant that there was a lack of grazing land for Turkish army’s numerous animals: many horses, oxen, and even camels had perished throughout the hot summer, and the heat had also spoiled supplies. “Despite the tribulations, spirits remain high among the troops,” Ajas Bey—an Ottoman military officer—wrote in a letter to his favored concubine. “We shall persevere because we are righteous—Inshallah, our sultan and Caliph shall lead us onward into paradise!” Within days, Suleiman was able to commence the shelling of the city—with the Turkish bombards firing stone and iron projectiles at Vienna’s city walls.

Aside from von Roggendorf, operational command of troops within the city went to Friedrich von Löwenstein—who led the mercenaries hired to reinforce the city. Löwenstein concerned himself with the fortification of the oldest walls of the city, near St. Stephen’s Cathedral. He also blocked off Vienna’s four city gates, and erected earthen bastions as well as a rampart within the city, in hopes of lengthening the siege on the Turkish side. The army of the Holy Roman Empire, the Reichsarmee had been deployed away from Vienna—at Passau, upon the Danube. Given the numerical superiority of the Turkish forces, the Reichsarmee was ordered to serve as a last defense, with some troops being dispatched to serve as raiders along the Danube—to attack Turkish supply flotillas carrying needed food, munitions, and other supplies that would be needed in a protracted siege. “Things are going well enough,” Charles wrote in a letter to his brother, Ferdinand. “Roggendorf continues to hold the city—he has banded together the citizens, and the reinforcements you sent last year have proven beyond helpful—the Spanish harquebusiers are an excellent shot. I only hope and pray that things continue to hold, and we shall be able to repulse the Turks from our lands.” The Turks having made landfall in Germany helped galvanize the princes in support of the emperor’s endeavor—even the Protestants looked to see the emperor succeed. Martin Luther in this period published On War Against the Turk. In it, Luther shifted his views from those in 1518, which saw the Turks as a scourge sent by God to deal with sinning Christians—a view shared by others, such as Erasmus. In his new treatise, Luther encouraged Germans and Charles V to resist the Turk and fight against them—though his attacks upon them were still mild, with the treatise referring to the Pope once more as the anti-Christ, while Jews were described as the Devil’s Incarnate. He strongly argued that the war should be seen as a secular one, fought in self-defense, rather than a religious war to gain territory.

The siege carried into the autumn. With the surrounding farmland having been spoiled by the Austrians, the Turks were ever more reliant upon forage from further afield—as well as regular supply barges being sent up the Danube from Ottoman territory. Such barges were regularly raided by imperial troops—with some even daring to make surreptitious treks into Vienna to deliver the city's needed supplies. “His Imperial Majesty requires further supplies,” Ibrahim Pasha, Suleiman’s Grand Vizier wrote in a letter to István Werboczy in August of 1533. “The city proves a harder nut to crack than anticipated…but the Padishah shall prevail, as Allah wills it!” Werboczy could only forward the letter nervously to Queen Anna, with his postscript added: “How much more can we be expected to give?” This placed Anna into a difficult situation which would prove to be her political baptism. She sent letters to the Sultan—offering up feminine flatteries while promising supplies as they could be requisitioned. Hungary’s harvest proved to be poor—and many peasants suffered under the weight of previous requisitions. Anna sought aid from her uncle in Poland—dispensing funds from the royal treasury to pay for grain imports—which were distributed to state granaries to aid the suffering peasants, rather than to supply the Turkish army. It was the Queen of Hungary’s quick thinking that kept Hungary from spiraling into further chaos—though the previous requisitions would cause economic issues and food insecurity for several years to come. Though aid was not forthcoming from Hungary, the Turks remained encamped outside Vienna—attacking the city daily with a series of bombardments, with sappers working on constructing tunnels and mines to breach the city walls. Löwenstein sent some of his men on daring raids—this included one raid where his men attempted to destroy several Ottoman mines underneath the city, which failed.

400px-Siegeofvienna1529.jpg

Fall of Vienna, c. 1533.

Vienna finally fell before the Ottoman troops on October 9, 1533—with Löwenstein perishing in the final assault. Wilhelm von Roggendorf was able to withdraw from the city before its collapse—along with some 3000 of the troops that had been sent in the previous year to reinforce the city. This included 250 Spanish harquebusiers under the command of Luis de Ávalos—the sole survivors of the Spanish contingent. As Roggendorf and his troops retreated towards Passau, they exacted a final revenge upon the Turkish troops—igniting a gunpowder magazine in their retreat. The explosion killed some thirty people—all civilians—and damaged the Hofburg. “The Turks and the Hungarians indulged in an orgy after the fall of the city,” Eva Farissol—a Viennese Jewess—wrote in a private journal many years later. “Women were torn from their homes and despoiled; the prettiest were left untouched. They were paraded before the sultan, who held court in the carnage of the Hofburg atop his golden throne. He gifted these women to his most valiant officers—who took them as slaves and concubines. The eagle atop the Stephansdom, a symbol of the emperor and his house was shorn from the cathedral and replaced with a crescent… transformed into a mosque. A muezzin was appointed into the south tower to lead the call to prayer, who sounded out across Vienna, a mournful dirge in the days following the sack…” Euphoric in his victory, Suleiman began to draw up plans for the unfinished northern tower of St. Stephen’s Cathedral to be transformed into a minaret. “This city shall be the gem of our empire in the heart of Europe—Constantinople upon the Danube,” Suleiman declared proudly.

“The city of our forefathers has fallen,” Charles wrote in a letter to Ferdinand—undated, but probably written several days following the collapse of Vienna. “The Reichsarmee remains in strong shape, and some 15,000 men have joined us here in Regensburg. I am resolved to march and meet this threat—this scourge of man and the Christendom can go no further.” Charles’ main concerns were for his family: he wrote firstly to Renée, ensconced at Trier with their newborn daughter, Anne. He requested that she return to the Low Countries—and invested her as regent of the Low Countries as he had the Empress Mary. To his sister, Mary, his tone was more urgent: “I gravely fear the Turks' next move. I doubt they will attempt to breach the mountains of Moravia or Bohemia—but you can never be sure. Be safe and remember that I am and will always remain your loving brother.” Mary herself was resolved that neither she nor her daughter would flee from Bohemia: “We were chased from Hungary—but we shall never be chased from Bohemia. Elisabeth is the queen, and the queen must stay. And I? I shall only leave this country in a coffin, and nothing else.” Still, seeking a more defensive position, Mary and Elisabeth departed Prague for Teplitz, where they took up residence in the fortified keep that had been built by Johanna Rozmitál, George Podiebrad’s wife and queen. It was at Teplitz where Mary—as well as Elisabeth, publicly took communion in the Protestant form for the first time. Mary was also reunited with her former chaplain—Matthias Dévai Biro—who in 1527 had left her service to study under Luther at Wittenburg. Now a Protestant minister, Mary gladly accepted him back into her service, naming him as her chaplain and banishing the Catholic remnants of her religious household. The little queen’s household was not spared either, with Mary replacing her daughter’s tutor with a German theologian from Breslau, Ambrosius Moibanus.

Charles’ letters soon reached Ferdinand in Spain—where the years since his installation as Prince of Asturias and the effective Viceroy of Spain had proceeded with peace and prosperity for plenty. Spanish explorers and conquistadors continued to explore the lands beyond the Ocean Sea—one conquistador, Francisco Pizarro had led an expedition into what became known as Peru, leading his Spanish troops—as well as his Indian allies to victory against the Incan Empire at the Battle of Huancabamba. The Incan Emperor, or Sapa Inca Huásar who had recently triumphed[2] over his brother was captured by Spanish troops—along with his treasure train—which measured one room full of gold, and two full of silver. Despite this, Huásar and his honor guard were tortured, and Huásar was executed with a garrotte. The capital of the Incan Empire, Cuzco, fell soon after—and another native empire and its treasures fell into Spanish hands. A younger brother of Huásar, Manco, was installed as Sapa Inca—his court an empty vanity, with effective control passing into the hands of the Spanish. Huásar’s wife, Chiqui was taken as a concubine by Francisco Pizarro—and many other Incan princesses, priestesses, and noblewomen found themselves likewise abducted and despoiled by their Spanish conquerors. Ferdinand continued to work closely with his councils and the Cortes, establishing beneficial relationships with both. Many of Charles’ former Spanish advisors, such as Francisco de los Cobos had left the service of the emperor to serve the Prince of Asturias instead—as the 1530s progressed, Ferdinand’s authority became more solidified. In his martial life, the Prince of Asturias was blessed—he was devoted to his wife, the Portuguese Infanta Isabella of Portugal, and she had born him a child nearly every year. By 1533, they had five children: Fernando Alonso (b. 1528), Maria (b. 1529), Isabella (b. 1530; d. 1531), Manuel (b. 1531), and Juan (b. 1533). Ferdinand’s marriage had been fruitful—and the Spanish line of the Habsburgs was secure.

400px-Brooklyn_Museum_-_Huascar%2C_Thirteenth_Inca%2C_1_of_14_Portraits_of_Inca_Kings_-_overall.jpg

Portrait of Huascar, c. 17th Century

Ferdinand was determined to render his brother whatever aid he could offer in his present situation—was it not the right thing to do? Though Ferdinand had reached his present position because of his hard work and ambition, it would have all been for naught had Charles not recognized that he was the correct person to govern Spain in his absence. How easy it might have been for Charles to send him elsewhere or refuse to name him as his heir—but he had. And for now, at least, Charles remained King of Spain and needed succor. Ferdinand summoned a meeting of the Cortes at Aranjuez, with the deputies meeting at one of the local churches—with Ferdinand requesting funds from the Cortes to fund an expedition into Germany—which he planned to lead personally. Compared to Charles’ often antagonistic relationship with the Cortes of Castile, Ferdinand’s relationship proved more fruitful and productive. Aside from furnishing Ferdinand with a subsidy of 200,000 ducats, they agreed to levy the Cruzada—an extraordinary tax that was raised in times of war. Ferdinand was prepared to furnish a troop of some 12,000 men which included not only harquebusiers but some of the first tercio units within the Spanish army, armed with pikes and guns. “His Majesty, the emperor, but more importantly, the King of Spain requires dire assistance to turn the tide against the Turkish hordes,” Ferdinand thundered in a speech before his troops in Barcelona in December of 1533. “In us runs the blood of conquerors, of valiant Christian heroes—it is we who repulsed the Moslems from Granada, the Jewel of Spain. It is our fathers and grandfathers who expulsed Boabdil from Granada, sending him weeping as he crossed the seas into Africa. So too, shall we send Suleiman weeping… away from Vienna and away from Europe!”

Aside from direct military support, Ferdinand directed the Spanish navy to harass Turkish shipping and to clamp down on the Ottoman corsairs, such as Heyreddin Barbarossa who acted with impunity in the Mediterranean. The Spanish navy collaborated in this matter with the Knights of St. John—who had been granted the Ionian Islands as a new base by the Republic of Venice, in exchange for an annual tribute. The Knights of St. John would in due time become colloquially known as the Knights of Corfu—named after the largest island as well as the largest city, which would become their new capital. Ferdinand and Spanish reinforcements would land in Trieste in April of 1534—by that time, the Turkish troops were once more on the move, having spent a harsh winter in Vienna—where sickness and deprivation had sapped and weakened the Turkish army. Aside from the troops, the animals suffered as well: “Our supply trains have been in disarray throughout the winter,” Qarajaoglu Beg, an Ottoman officer wrote in a desperate letter to his father. “The freezing weather has caused the Danube to freeze over in various places… everything must be carried overland. Supplies either arrive late or not at all, for the Germans continue to plunder what they can. Many animals have been slaughtered for their meat, while others have sickened from a lack of fodder. Even among the Siphais, many of them have been forced to cull their mounts due to the need…” As the winter ended and the campaign season of 1534 began, the Turkish army remained in Vienna as it awaited further supplies—detachments were sent out to forage, and raiders attacked Korneuburg and Laxenburg.

Charles in March of 1534 left his position at Regensburg for Passau, where his troops were grouped with the Reichsarmee as well as Roggendorf’s troops—numbering some 34,000 men all. “We are preparing to make our stand near Krems, along the Danube,” Charles wrote to Ferdinand in the spring of 1534. “We shall await your arrival… Godspeed that your journey is without issue, and you and your men will arrive safely.” As Charles set out for Krems, Ferdinand and his troops set sail from Barcelona—they would arrive at Trieste in early May—detained for a period at Messina due to an outbreak of scurvy. “We had little time to rest upon our arrival in Trieste,” Baltasar de Mondrágon, a Spanish soldier wrote in his memoirs. “Our march through Carinola and Styria was arduous—I prayed daily to the Virgin Mary for deliverance, that our mission might not be in vain…” It was only in May, when rumors reached Vienna that the emperor had raised a relief force to recapture Vienna that Suleiman ordered the army mustered. The great Turkish army that had invaded Europe two years previously was in poor shape: many of the cavalrymen were lacking horses and were a desperate need of draft animals. Even Zápolya’s cavalrymen had not escaped unscathed—he’d lost nearly 5000 men—and 3000 of those to disease alone. Though Suleiman had plundered the Hofburg’s treasury, with many items sent south during the previous winter, the lack of draft animals and the need to march meant that much more of the Turks’ intended plunder was abandoned.

Among the abandoned plunder was an item of particular importance that John Zápolya managed to send back to his wife in Hungary—the Reliquary Cross that had been made for Louis I of Hungary in the 1370s—said to include pieces of the True Cross. “I send this back to you,” Zápolya wrote in a letter to Queen Anna. “Not because it is an object of religious devotion (you know I care not for such trifles) but because it is an important piece of our heritage. Your heritage—it belongs in Buda, not in Vienna.” Anna had the relic displayed before the court during a court sermon, which was given by János Sylvester, a recent graduate from Wittenburg. “See the false idol before you,” Sylvester thundered from his pulpit, where he pointed dramatically at the relic. “Catholics truly believe that such trinkets will offer them a way into the afterlife—that they must languish in purgatory until they are worthy! Faith and faith alone are what matters—Christ, our God and Lord died for our sins, and was risen again for our justification.” Before the whole of the court, Sylvester smashed the reliquary—pointing to the pieces of wood scattered amongst the broken crystal and gilt. “These are no pieces from the cross of Our Lord—merely cuttings from a branch—and more proof of the lies of the false church and their false prophets!” Sylvester's speech was highly appreciated—and marked the beginning of Hungary’s shift towards the Protestant faith.

400px-Suleiman_I_in_Moldva.jpg

Suleiman in Austria, c. 1534.

By early May, Ferdinand and his relief force reached Krems, where they were able to rendezvous with Charles’ troops. The combined forces at Krems numbered nearly 46,000 men—along with some 120 artillery pieces. Charles ordered the army encamped outside of Krems, and scouts sent out by an imperial commander, Johann Katzianer soon reported that the Turks were encamped near Tulln, some forty miles from Krems. In a war council before Charles and Ferdinand, two different viewpoints were argued: some, such as Katzianer, argued that their position should be improved at Krems and they pursued a defensive war against the Turks. Others, such as Roggendorf, argued that the Turkish army had suffered grave losses since their capture of Vienna—and each mile took them further away from Turkish territory, making the resupply of the army ever more difficult. Roggendorf argued that their best bet was a surprise offensive against the Turks—if they were successful, they would be able to give the Turks not only the black eye that they deserved but earn a vital victory for the emperor and the empire, too. Ferdinand deferred to Charles, telling the emperor that: “You are in command here—and it is your word that is law. If you believe the defense shall lead us to victory, then let us defend Krems with every drop of blood. However, if you firmly believe our path is through the offensive, then let us march.” It was an easy choice for the emperor: the Turks had already marched a mile too far into his dominions. He would take the war to them, and he would succeed.

The imperial army came upon the Turkish troops near the hamlet of Grafenwörth on May 27th, 1534. The Battle of Grafenwörth, as it became known, broke out in the early morning hours when the imperial army set upon the Turks as they were breaking down their camp, taking them by complete surprise. The Turkish cavalry was demoralized and many of them without mounts, were unable to effectively counter the imperial cavalry charge, which opened the battle. “The imperial cavalry charge cut through the Moslems like butter—their sabers creating a sea of red upon the early morning soil,” an imperial soldier wrote in his journals. “The Turks were disorganized… while the Hungarian cavalry attempted to counter against our attack, they soon met the volley of the imperial artillery, which added skin, bone, and viscera to the growing pools of blood…” Grafenwörth lasted only two hours, with Sultan Suleiman, with his army in poor shape, chose to withdraw his troops from the field. The imperial army suffered only 2000 casualties—with Sultan Suleiman losing some 6000 men, with another 3000 taken hostage. John Zápolya’s troops suffered most heavily—over half of his cavalrymen were lost in battle, and a further 1500 were captured in battle. While Grafenwörth was no huge turning point in Ottoman ambitions in Europe—their losses in battle had been minimal—it represented an important propaganda victory for Christian Europe: the Turks were not unstoppable, and their offense into Europe could be contained.

Following the defeat at Grafenwörth, the Turkish army retreated through Vienna into Hungary—the Turkish army in tatters as it did so. “When the Padishah retreated to Buda following the retreat from Grafenwörth, his mood was dark and foul… he was curt with King of Hungary—and short. He demanded ƒ60,000 from the Hungarian treasury in exchange—the annual tribute which was owed for the past two previous years,” a historian of the period wrote. “The Hungarian treasury, impoverished by its previous support of the Sultan was in little position to pay what was owed, with King John offering ƒ15,000 immediately with the promises of more. This did not please the Sultan, who reportedly told the king ‘If I cannot be given what I am owed, then it must be taken.’ The Padishah left Buda soon after—but only with the 15,000 which King John could pay.” Suleiman soon made good upon his promise to Zápolya—he introduced Turkish troops into Hungary, who occupied Osijek, Pétérvárad, and Temesvár, as well as several other Hungarian fortifications along the border. Aside from this, Suleiman ordered a janissary regiment garrisoned in Buda Castle—ostensibly this was a gift from the Sultan for the protection of an esteemed ally and friend—but in reality, all knew it was meant to keep Hungary and its king in line.

[1] Made some changes to the names I proposed previously.

[2] IOTL, Huásar was killed by Atahualpa.
 
Last edited:
Very interesting chapter, confirmed Protestant Hungary, a Vienna that actually falls but the Turks still being driven back while Catholics and Protestants can't get along nor reconcile. The Vienna one is the most interesting imo as even though it has seen the Turks repulsed from further ravages into Europe still means that Austria will no longer be seen as safe and that could mean the Hapsburgs move in fully towards the Low Countries and make it their center of power to run the HRE from there, even if that doesn't happen, the place will still be very much a valued possession to be used whenever Austria itself is in danger.
 
A big chapter! And lots of things happening! Nice to see the Habsburgs repulse the Turks even though Vienna falls
Among the abandoned plunder was an item of particular importance that John Zápolya managed to send back to his wife in Hungary—the Reliquary Cross that had been made for Louis I of Hungary in the 1370s—said to include pieces of the True Cross. “I send this back to you,” Zápolya wrote in a letter to Queen Anna. “Not because it is an object of religious devotion (you know I care not for such trifles) but because it is an important piece of our heritage. Your heritage—it belongs in Buda, not in Vienna.” Anna had the relic displayed before the court during a court sermon, which was given by János Sylvester, a recent graduate from Wittenburg. “See the false idol before you,” Sylvester thundered from his pulpit, where he pointed dramatically at the relic. “Catholics truly believe that such trinkets will offer them a way into the afterlife—that they must languish in purgatory until they are worthy! Faith and faith alone are what matters—Christ, our God and Lord died for our sins, and was risen again for our justification.” Before the whole of the court, Sylvester smashed the reliquary—pointing to the pieces of wood scattered amongst the broken crystal and gilt. “These are no pieces from the cross of Our Lord—merely cuttings from a branch—and more proof of the lies of the false church and their false prophets!” Sylvester's speech was highly appreciated—and marked the beginning of Hungary’s shift towards the Protestant faith.
As a historian, I am, however, furious at this. Don’t smash historical artefacts in the name of faith! Stupid radical Protestants with no sense of splendor
In his martial life, the Prince of Asturias was blessed—he was devoted to his wife, the Portuguese Infanta Isabella of Portugal, and she had born him a child nearly every year. By 1533, they had five children: Fernando Alonso (b. 1528), Maria (b. 1529), Isabella (b. 1530; d. 1531), Manuel (b. 1531), and Juan (b. 1533). Ferdinand’s marriage had been fruitful—and the Spanish line of the Habsburgs was secure.
Nice to see the Spanish line prosper here. Hopefully we won’t see the same insane level of inbreeding as otl. Hopefully, Charles and Renee keeps the Austrian line secure as well

Can’t wait for next chapter! Time to bring vengeance to Buda and beyond!
 
A big chapter! And lots of things happening! Nice to see the Habsburgs repulse the Turks even though Vienna falls

As a historian, I am, however, furious at this. Don’t smash historical artefacts in the name of faith! Stupid radical Protestants with no sense of splendor

Nice to see the Spanish line prosper here. Hopefully we won’t see the same insane level of inbreeding as otl. Hopefully, Charles and Renee keeps the Austrian line secure as well

Can’t wait for next chapter! Time to bring vengeance to Buda and beyond!


I also agree with this, especially after visiting Bavaria last month, I saw a semi-destroyed monument around Munich ( which I thought was so because of the two great wars ) but instead it had been deliberately not renovated after 30YW to remind the Bavarians when the Protestants were barbaric who didn't recognize either art or beauty or the importance of history ( it was an Abbey which dated back to around 800 BC. ) , and so it was a kind of warning to say never again.... ( let's say that when the guide is there I'll explain it, I was very upset, in fact almost I blanched ( but I also confess a lot of anger ) considering that Gustavus Adolphus had promised to go to Italy and do the same things..... )



if I then start thinking about how much art and culture in general has been lost forever by the iconoclastic fury of the Protestants, passing through the Netherlands, Germany and England ( just to cite the examples that come most easily to mind ) well I won't deny that it's difficult for me to agree with their opinions ( maybe it's because I'm Italian, therefore potentially a bit biased ) but honestly their churches are like saying... empty and at times cold almost minimalistic ( at least for me, no offense let it be clear ) but in the end I blame this sense of anger that I feel more towards the Catholic faction of the period than towards them ( it would be too simple and banal ) because if it hadn't been for Clement VII and his stupidity / total incompetence , many of these things could have been avoided at least in part ( of course it would have been better if many of his OTL predecessors ( Sixtus IV, Innocent VIII maybe also Julius II ) had not even come remotely close to the papacy, but unfortunately that's how it went.... )
 
Last edited:
Many of Charles’ former Spanish advisors, such as Francisco de los Cobos had left the service of the emperor to serve the Prince of Asturias instead—as the 1530s progressed, Ferdinand’s authority became more solidified. In his martial life, the Prince of Asturias was blessed—he was devoted to his wife, the Portuguese Infanta Isabella of Portugal, and she had born him a child nearly every year. By 1533, they had five children: Fernando Alonso (b. 1528), Maria (b. 1529), Isabella (b. 1530; d. 1531), Manuel (b. 1531), and Juan (b. 1533). Ferdinand’s marriage had been fruitful—and the Spanish line of the Habsburgs was secure.
I'm so happy for this! Three sons to secure the spanish realms!
 
Very interesting chapter, confirmed Protestant Hungary, a Vienna that actually falls but the Turks still being driven back while Catholics and Protestants can't get along nor reconcile. The Vienna one is the most interesting imo as even though it has seen the Turks repulsed from further ravages into Europe still means that Austria will no longer be seen as safe and that could mean the Hapsburgs move in fully towards the Low Countries and make it their center of power to run the HRE from there, even if that doesn't happen, the place will still be very much a valued possession to be used whenever Austria itself is in danger.
Yes, Vienna being sacked will have a large knock off effects. Granted, Charles hasn't resided there and even moved many of the Imperial / Austrian governmental organs such as the Aulic Council, Imperial Chancery, and the Privy Council from Austria (they'd been in Innsbruck following Maximilian's death) to Brussels which is his capital, but the city being sacked mean that it's unlikely to be seen as a safe position for a capital and will likely remain as the 'frontier' of the Habsburg dominions.

As a historian, I am, however, furious at this. Don’t smash historical artefacts in the name of faith! Stupid radical Protestants with no sense of splendor
I hate it as well, but unfortunately we know that the Protestants of this period really had no problem in smashing relics, icons, and other items of splendor in their attacks on Iconoclasm. I won't comment on Louis I's reliquary and what it truly contained, but I know plenty of Protestants used such relics as 'proof' of the Catholic Church continuing to lie to people: Hailes Abbey, in England, had a relic that was supposedly a vial of Christ's blood, and people came from far and wide to venerate the relic (and pay for the pleasure!) Protestant sermons in London in the period denounced the relic as nothing more than Duck's blood that was regularly renewed. I was influenced by that, and could imagine a Hungarian minister attacking this relic and destroying it before the congregation as proof of the church's lies... even as he destroys an important piece of Hungarian historical heritage. I also thought it interesting that while other historical artefacts will survive IATL for various reasons, others (such as the treasures in the Hofburg) will be lost for other reasons.

if I then start thinking about how much art and culture in general has been lost forever by the iconoclastic fury of the Protestants, passing through the Netherlands, Germany and England ( just to cite the examples that come most easily to mind ) well I won't deny that it's difficult for me to agree with their opinions ( maybe it's because I'm Italian, therefore potentially a bit biased ) but honestly their churches are like saying... empty and at times cold almost minimalistic ( at least for me, no offense let it be clear ) but in the end I blame this sense of anger that I feel more towards the Catholic faction of the period than towards them ( it would be too simple and banal ) because if it hadn't been for Clement VII and his stupidity / total incompetence , many of these things could have been avoided at least in part ( of course it would have been better if many of his OTL predecessors ( Sixtus IV, Innocent VIII maybe also Julius II ) had not even come remotely close to the papacy, but unfortunately that's how it went.... )
Protestant Churches definitely lack a lot of the beauty that Catholic Churches do: especially churches in the more reformist / Calvinist vein. I will say that some Anglican Churches in England still retain some of their splendor, though many churches were ruined during the reign of Edward VI which saw the English reformation trend towards more radical reform. Elizabeth I brought the English church back towards the middle ground, and while her own religious beliefs were firmly Protestant, she had a love for Catholic splendor that could be seen in her own private chapels, but visitations in 1560 carried out more attacks on what the Protestants saw as idoltry.

I'm so happy for this! Three sons to secure the spanish realms!
Yes! Ferdinand and his line are well and secure!
 
Last edited:
I half-expected Suleiman to serve Charles a crushing defeat to further tarnish his name, but realistically maintaining such a massive army so far from home is nigh impossible for any ruler, even one as capable as the greatest of Sultans. Still then a shame that the Imperial forces were denied a sweeping victory to make up for the sack of Vienna, but I suppose sending the Ottomans scurrying back across the border in disgrace and starving is more than enough. It will be some time before Suleiman can again even consider mounting a fresh offensive against the Christians, if indeed he ever does. I wonder how gravely this failure will affect Suleiman's future reign, though he survived the fallout of his 1529 campaign well enough.

What interests me however is whether or not the Sultan will have to grapple with the very real possibility that Hungary will no longer be an ally. The Turks reaaalllly overstayed their welcome in Hungary, and the burden of maintaining the Sultan's army, not to mention the humiliation of Jannisaries being garrisoned in Buda itself, don't bode well for Zápolya's regime. I'd bet money his reign will soon come to an end whether through conspiracy from within, or a return of the rightful queen with the backing of a Bohemian army.
 
Very cool to see the Ottomans do better and actually capture Vienna. Hungary’s subservience hasn’t put it in a better position, but it may benefit in the long term since it hasn’t faced the same level of destruction. I wonder if it’ll end up being treated similarly to the Romanian principalities or manage to realign somehow (although that would be trading one master for another, not true independence).

I’m also glad that you didn’t gloss over Spain’s conquest of Tawantinsuyu and even included some butterflies there. While Spain may be more prosperous with an independent ruler, it’s important to remember where much of that wealth is coming from. They’re just as happy to loot and demolish religious icons and cultural treasures when it suits them.
 
I half-expected Suleiman to serve Charles a crushing defeat to further tarnish his name, but realistically maintaining such a massive army so far from home is nigh impossible for any ruler, even one as capable as the greatest of Sultans. Still then a shame that the Imperial forces were denied a sweeping victory to make up for the sack of Vienna, but I suppose sending the Ottomans scurrying back across the border in disgrace and starving is more than enough. It will be some time before Suleiman can again even consider mounting a fresh offensive against the Christians, if indeed he ever does. I wonder how gravely this failure will affect Suleiman's future reign, though he survived the fallout of his 1529 campaign well enough.

What interests me however is whether or not the Sultan will have to grapple with the very real possibility that Hungary will no longer be an ally. The Turks reaaalllly overstayed their welcome in Hungary, and the burden of maintaining the Sultan's army, not to mention the humiliation of Jannisaries being garrisoned in Buda itself, don't bode well for Zápolya's regime. I'd bet money his reign will soon come to an end whether through conspiracy from within, or a return of the rightful queen with the backing of a Bohemian army.
I considered a variety of endings: I knew that I wanted Vienna to fall, and IOTL the 1529 siege mainly failed because of weather reasons, heavy rains that muddied the roads and prevented the Ottomans from bringing many of the guns they needed for the siege. I wanted to explore the logistics of armies of the period, as that was usually the primary issue.... hence Charles' victory, as I figured Suleiman's army was probably at it's logistical limit, even with Hungarian support, as the Turkish army spent nearly two years outside Turkish soil, and heavily reliant upon the Hungarians to provide needed supplies to the detriment of their own populace, while supplies from the Ottoman empire would have to travel up the Danube and could be subject to raids from Imperial troops, suffering a cold winter in Vienna, not to mention the fodder / grazing land needed for the animals to supply an army of 100,000 men. I don't think the attack will have much effect on Suleiman's reputation: he chose to withdraw his army from the field rather than continue, and his losses are rather minimal in the long run. It gives Charles a victory he so desperately needs, and will help burnish his reputation compared to the early part of his reign.

I think that this campaign has most definitely soured relations between Zápolya and the Sultan, hence Suleiman's occupation of Hungarian border fortresses and sending a garrison of troops to Buda. There's no doubt that those who support the claim of Louis II's daughter will continue to conspire against him, though they've been dealt a heavy blow by the Turks as well. The magnates, with the losses of their numbers at Mohacs, losses in the Sopron rebellion, not to mention Zápolya's taxation / economic policies have heavily targeted the magnates, with the requisitions of cattle and grain being levied primarily against peasantry who worked upon the lands of the magnates.

Very cool to see the Ottomans do better and actually capture Vienna. Hungary’s subservience hasn’t put it in a better position, but it may benefit in the long term since it hasn’t faced the same level of destruction. I wonder if it’ll end up being treated similarly to the Romanian principalities or manage to realign somehow (although that would be trading one master for another, not true independence).

I’m also glad that you didn’t gloss over Spain’s conquest of Tawantinsuyu and even included some butterflies there. While Spain may be more prosperous with an independent ruler, it’s important to remember where much of that wealth is coming from. They’re just as happy to loot and demolish religious icons and cultural treasures when it suits them.
Thank you! I definitely wanted to explore the idea of Vienna falling, even if it's a temporary loss. I don't think I've ever read any alternate history where that occurs, and it's interesting to imagine the knock off effects and how the city might be rebuilt once it's recaptured. Hungary is definitely in a different position: it's avoided the despoliation which followed IOTL following Mohacs, with Hungary becoming a battle ground between the Habsburgs and the Turks, but their attachment to the Turks hasn't done them much good, has it? Peasants are restless in the south, others starve because of forced seizures... Zápolya definitely might be reconsidering his alliance with the Turk, but he's in a poor position to consider changing that. With Anna spearheading a change in faith for the kingdom, perhaps Zápolya might seek out allies among the Protestants in Germany.

I thought it important to mention the goings on in the Americas: even if they aren't the primary focus. Ferdinand may be the one in control of Spain, and Spain's wealth isn't being (as) wasted abroad as it was IOTL, but the great treasures pouring into the country are because of the destruction of native empires, both the Aztecs and Incas. who as you said, aren't above destroying the religious and cultural heritages of those states or taking them as loot.
 
Protestant Churches definitely lack a lot of the beauty that Catholic Churches do: especially churches in the more reformist / Calvinist vein. I will say that some Anglican Churches in England still retain some of their splendor, though many churches were ruined during the reign of Edward VI which saw the English reformation trend towards more radical reform. Elizabeth I brought the English church back towards the middle ground, and while her own religious beliefs were firmly Protestant, she had a love for Catholic splendor that could be seen in her own private chapels, but visitations in 1560 carried out more attacks on what the Protestants saw as idolatry.
That wasn't the end of it. Dorothy Sayers' mystery The Nine Tailors takes place in and around a beautiful old parish church; but as the vicar's wife says, "The glass in the nave has all gone, of course—Cromwell’s men."
 
That wasn't the end of it. Dorothy Sayers' mystery The Nine Tailors takes place in and around a beautiful old parish church; but as the vicar's wife says, "The glass in the nave has all gone, of course—Cromwell’s men."
Yep, the Puritans: they believed that the Church of England had retained too many Catholic rituals and practices. Puritan religious thought was heavily influenced by Calvinism, and many of the Marian Exiles who had left England during the reign of Mary Tudor sought exile on the continent, which exposed them to reformed churches and how they were governed and ran. Elizabeth's own personal beliefs and how her own chapel looked was contrary to what many of her subjects and countrymen thought their churches should look like.
 
Loved the parallels between Suleiman's treatment of Vienna and the Conquistador's treatment of the South Americans and their capital, and ruler.

Also--interesting how Hungary might become a bastion of Protestantism, but only because they are under Suleiman's, um, protection...

Plenty of other strongholds of ATL Protestantism around still I suppose--Saxony is not all that far off from Hungary for one. But now the reform is tainted with extremism, and subservience to Islamic power.

Islam also has its iconoclastic traditions after all, and the smashing of the reliquary happened in a place and court under Suleiman's overlordship.

I hardly expect the impulse to reformation to be short-circuited completely, but if the Catholic side is capable of any sort of astute reconciliation, Protestants elsewhere in Europe seem to me to be under some pressure now to reciprocate leading perhaps to a Catholic system that is more pluralistic in dogma and rite, and somewhat decentralized from tight Papal Curia control.

BTW I consider myself well answered regarding suggestions I made for the nature of John and Mary's relationship and rule in England and Denmark, and agree it is premature and hyperbolic to leap to a grand North Sea empire just yet or perhaps ever. However I still suggest that both England and Scotland might be places which remain nominally entirely Catholic, but where this plurality of rite combined with general adoption of a few variants that OTL would consider completely Protestant are within the latitude of the expanded Catholic range of tolerance in the ATL.
 
Loved the parallels between Suleiman's treatment of Vienna and the Conquistador's treatment of the South Americans and their capital, and ruler.

Also--interesting how Hungary might become a bastion of Protestantism, but only because they are under Suleiman's, um, protection...

Plenty of other strongholds of ATL Protestantism around still I suppose--Saxony is not all that far off from Hungary for one. But now the reform is tainted with extremism, and subservience to Islamic power.

Islam also has its iconoclastic traditions after all, and the smashing of the reliquary happened in a place and court under Suleiman's overlordship.

I hardly expect the impulse to reformation to be short-circuited completely, but if the Catholic side is capable of any sort of astute reconciliation, Protestants elsewhere in Europe seem to me to be under some pressure now to reciprocate leading perhaps to a Catholic system that is more pluralistic in dogma and rite, and somewhat decentralized from tight Papal Curia control.

BTW I consider myself well answered regarding suggestions I made for the nature of John and Mary's relationship and rule in England and Denmark, and agree it is premature and hyperbolic to leap to a grand North Sea empire just yet or perhaps ever. However I still suggest that both England and Scotland might be places which remain nominally entirely Catholic, but where this plurality of rite combined with general adoption of a few variants that OTL would consider completely Protestant are within the latitude of the expanded Catholic range of tolerance in the ATL.
Thank you, Shevek!

Hungary's Protestant development will definitely be interesting: IOTL, the Zápolya portion of Hungary (which later evolved into the Principality of Transylvania) actually became a bastion of tolerance, which was practically unheard of in the 16th century. I believe the kingdom ended up turning towards Calvinism, but Lutheranism remained popular amongst the German populations in Transylvania... there were also Unitarians and various other Christian sects, as well as the Orthodox Church amongst the Romanians. The Catholic Church continued to exist as well, albeit in a smaller form. All gained tolerance and respect for their beliefs, and the Protestant position was so solidified that they had little issue in electing a Stephen Báthory, a Catholic, as their monarch.

I definitely think Hungary's reform movement will cause some criticism for the movement as a whole: especially as Anna of Hungary's court preacher was educated in Wittenburg. Combine that with Luther's very mild attacks on the Turks compared to his attacks on the Pope and Jews, it gives the Catholic party some real ammunition to attack the Protestants with (combine that with Philip of Hesse... we are approaching the period when he desired another wife, and sought permission from Luther and Melanchthon to commit bigamy. Depending on how that plays out, it could cause even more PR issues for the Protestant cause, depending on how Luther handles it) .

There's definitely a movement in Germany amongst the Catholics that seeks to reduce Papal control: the Honorians are essentially German Gallicans, and desire for the emperor to have more say over the church, similar to the King of France in France. Or if you want to be even more specific, they desire for the emperor to regain prerogatives that he has lost over the century. Charles V himself is certainly not reformist, but the movement can be used and harnessed as one for imperial reform, to achieve what his grandfather Maximilian was unable to do, and to stop the erosion of imperial authority in Germany.

There will definitely be pockets of the reformist movement in the British Isles; I can definitely see the commercial classes being drawn to such things, while the crown continues to do what they can to fix issues with the Catholic Church and it's position in England. The Church could also develop differently depending on the next Papacies and how the eventual General Council plays out; perhaps rather than seeking to impose the Roman Rite / Missal as occurred IOTL, perhaps local rites are encouraged, such as the Sarum Rite becoming popularized and used across England; the Nidaros rite gaining new prominence in Norway, ect.
 
Last edited:
Chapter 25. The Artois War
Chapter 25. The Artois War
1536-1539; Germany, France & Italy.

“I have resided in France since my youngest years, and now the Dauphin, François, has taken me as his wife. I am and shall always remain loyal to him—and to France. His cause is mine; now and forever.”
— Princess Isabella of Austria


Music Accompaniment: Missa Fortuna Desperata: Kyrie

400px-Corneille_de_la_haye_called_corneille_de_lyon_portrait_of_a_lady_half071655%29.jpg

Portrait of Isabelle d'Autriche, Dauphine of France.

The seeds for the next conflict between King François and Emperor Charles V were laid in the Treaty of Longwy which had ended the War of the League of Valenciennes. The treaty affirmed the betrothal between François’ son, the Dauphin François with Charles’ eldest daughter, Isabelle. It stipulated that Isabelle was to receive the provinces of Artois and Franche-Comté as her dowry, which would be handed over to France following the marriage, effectively passing the issue down the road. The years in Europe had seen peace reign between France and the emperor, but by the end of 1535 matters would soon come to a head, when the French court announced that the Dauphin and the Princess Isabelle would be married in August of 1536.

Isabella, or Isabelle as she became known in France was the eldest surviving daughter of Charles and his first wife, Mary. Born at the Palace of Mechelen, in her veins ran the blood of Europe’s greatest heritages: the Archdukes of Austria, Dukes of Burgundy, and the Kings of England and Spain. Yet only a short period of her life would be spent in the Low Countries; at the age of five, Isabelle was handed over into the care of France, where she was raised as a French Princess and a fille de France. Isabelle would never see her mother again, who passed away in 1529. Isabelle’s care was managed by the Governess of the Children of France with Isabelle sharing a household with François’ youngest daughters, Anne and Victoire. “Madame Victoire was passionately attached to Madame Isabelle—they were friends from the very day that they met, given that they were the same age,” Madame Brissac, Governess of the Children of France wrote in a letter to her daughter. “Madame Isabelle also adored the Dauphin… who adored her in return. From the beginning, they got on as if they had known each other their whole lives.” Though Isabelle adjusted to her place in the French court, she often suffered bouts of ill health—insomnia, migraines, and mysterious stomach pains—that some doctors attributed to homesickness and loneliness.

“The Princesse of Bourgogne is very pretty,” one visitor to the French court wrote in 1535—observing Isabelle, then fourteen. “She has inherited her father’s coloring, with blonde hair and green eyes, shaped like almonds. She greatly resembles her mother, the late empress; her lips are plump, and her nose petite. She possesses the Habsburg jaw of her father, though it adds—rather than detracts to her beauty and dignity.” From a very young age, Isabelle was the second lady of the French court behind the Queen of France—though her ill health meant that she was often absent from certain court entertainments and representational duties, which caused conflict between the queen and the princess—with Beatriz accusing Isabelle of faking her illnesses to avoid her duties. “It seems mademoiselle has been ill yet again? Your presence was missed yesterday at a feast held in honor of your father’s ambassador,” Queen Beatriz remarked pointedly to Isabelle in one meeting—heard before all the court. “I am pleased to have been missed, madame,” Isabelle retorted in return. “It is a pity that none would miss you were you ill.” Little surprise that Isabelle, much like King François’ children from his first marriage—did not get along with the queen—while her relationship with the king’s mistress, the Duchess of Plaisance, was much warmer. Isabelle also got along well with King François, whom she called Papa Roi—the king in turn, treated Isabelle as his daughter, and often spoiled her with various gifts and trinkets. Isabelle’s relationship with her father, the emperor was much more distant and sustained primarily through letters. “I hope that this letter finds you well and in good health… I was much grieved to hear that have been ill recently,” Charles V wrote in a letter to his daughter. “I shall be sending an envoy, the Ritter von Borié in the next few months… he has a few gifts that I hope you shall enjoy, including a sapphire necklace that was a favorite of your maman. I think of you daily and wish that you were here with us… Marie and Maximilian miss you terribly and await your letters with great interest. The empress is doing well, and I can write to you with great joy that you are once again a big sister—the empress has delivered a healthy son, whom we have named Charles…”

Isabelle was educated closely alongside François’ younger daughters, Anne and Victoire. She was taught etiquette and deportment by Louise de La Rocque, while Henri de Gorla served as Isabelle’s dancing master. Isabelle also had a variety of music teachers—Francesco Flaminia taught her how to play the virginals, which she played “splendidly… like an angel,” while Jean Desmares gave the princess lute lessons. “The education of King François’ daughters—and his future daughter-in-law—were not grounded in ‘heavy’ learning,” one courtier wrote decades later—in a treatise that advocated for female education. “Their lessons in history, mathematics, and ancient languages were cursory—more time was given over to practical lessons such as deportment and etiquette, while cultural lessons in music, dancing, and poetry formed most of their learning… François sought for his daughters to be cultured and well-read, not well-educated harridans. While some would argue that François neglected his daughter-in-law’s education, others believed that she was merely being prepared for her role as the future first woman of the French Court, and François wished her to be armed with all the knowledge that she would need to be an arbiter of taste and fashion. In that, her education well perfectly executed.

500px-Ve%C3%BCe_de_la_principale_entr%C3%A9e_de_l%27Eglise_Nostre_Dame_de_Paris._Paris_Mus%C3%A9es_20230619193518.jpg

Notre Dame de Paris, c. 1537.

Envoys from François and Charles met at Amiens at the beginning of 1536 to ratify the marriage treaty between the Dauphin François and Princess Isabelle. The terms at Longwy signed six years prior still held, with Charles V pledging that both Artois and Franche-Comté would serve as his daughter’s dowry—with the emperor also agreeing to pay a cash sum of 250,000 ducats. Already on the French side, preparations were being made for the Dauphin’s marriage—the first marriage of a Dauphin of France in over a century. The formal betrothal of the Dauphin and Isabelle was held at the Louvre Palace—as Isabelle signed the papers that inched her closer to her marriage, plots were unfolding in the Low Countries. “The emperor’s position had improved since 1530,” one historian of the period wrote. “And he was riding high following his victory over the Turks at Grafenwörth. His chancellor, Nicolas de Perrenot, encouraged him to stand strong: pay the dowry, but to not cede an inch of land to the fiendish French.” Already the seeds of the next conflict were being lain—with Charles seeking out support abroad for his cause. A primary piece of support came from his brother in Spain—Ferdinand was eager to ratify an offensive alliance aimed against France—still smarting the troubles that the French had caused in Navarre. Ferdinand had other reasons to seek revenge: Ferdinand had suggested a marriage between his eldest son, Fernando Alonso, with Henri II of Navarre’s daughter and heiress, Françoise Fébé[1] in hopes of settling the matter of Navarre, but the match was angrily refused by Henri II.

Charles V also sought a rapprochement with Pope Pius V. The Synod of Trier had rendered its answers before the emperor in 1535; there were no hopes of reconciliation between the Catholics and Protestants, but the emperor did receive favorable answers from the Catholic prelates regarding the political questions he had posed. The failure of the Council of Bologna—as well as Charles’ victory over the Turks, gave both the pope and the emperor new grounds to reconcile and negotiate, especially as Pius V began to tire over the profound influence that King François continued to hold over Italy. Pius V dispatched a papal legate, Alessandro Cesarini not only to negotiate terms for a possible alliance between the emperor and the pope—but to negotiate a new concordat to govern relations between the church and the Holy Roman Empire, as requested by Charles V. The terms of the Concordat of Aix-la-Chapelle, as it became known, represented a triumph for the Honorians and limited Papal control over the Church in Germany. While the Pope was affirmed in his right to collect all revenues that the Catholic Church generated within the empire, the emperor was given explicit rights for the first time to collect tithes from the clergy and to restrict their right to appeal to Rome. The emperor also achieved a victory in the appointment of benefices: previously limited to select bishoprics within the empire, this right was extended throughout the empire—though not within the electorates, where the Prince’s Concordat of 1447 remained in force. The Concordat was not a total loss for the Catholic Church: installation of church officers remained in the hands of the Pope, and the Concordat reaffirmed the Pope’s right to veto any choice the emperor might make for clerical office who was truly unqualified. Other terms of the concordat gave the Apostolic Camera the right to collect the first year of revenue from each benefice. Pius V also his signaled his openness to crowning Charles as emperor—assuming the issue with the French in Italy could be dealt with. Charles was also able to resume friendly relations with Poland, following the death of Barbara Zápolya, the Queen of Poland following complications with the gout in her feet that had long troubled her. Charles and Sigismund negotiated the Treaty of Lublin, which arranged for the betrothal of Charles’ second daughter, Marie, with Sigismund’s eldest son and heir, also named Sigismund (b. 1515).

400px-Anonymous_-_Portrait_of_a_boy%2C_possibly_Sigismund_Augustus_%281520-1572%29.jpg

Prince Sigismund of Poland, c. 1527.

The Dauphin François and Isabelle were wed on the feast of St. Louis at Notre Dame in August 1536. The wedding procession began at the palace of the Bishop of Paris and traveled to Notre Dame through a newly built gallery that connected the palace to Notre Dame. “The princess was dressed splendidly,” the ambassador of Venice wrote in his dispatch. “Her dress was made of Persian velvet in a dazzling azure blue, in the French style. Her bodice was etched with golden thread and pearls. Her mantle was purple and trimmed with ermine. About her neck, she wore a necklace of diamonds and sapphires—a personal gift from the king—worth some 500,000 écus.” The religious service was conducted by the Cardinal de Bourbon, while the mass was celebrated by the Bishop of Paris. Entertainment and dances were held at the Louvre in celebration of the wedding—where the Dauphin François and Isabelle would spend their first wedding night. Their honeymoon would be spent on a tour of Brittany, where they would stay at the Château des Ducs de Bretagne. The Dauphin and Dauphine presided over a meeting of the Estates of Brittany, called by King François as administrator of the Duchy of Brittany. The Estates promulgated what would become known as the Edict of Vannes, providing for a perpetual union between France and Brittany while allowing Brittany to maintain all privileges, liberties, and exemptions given by the previous Dukes of Brittany. The Dauphin and Dauphine were crowned soon after at Rennes as Duke and Duchess of Brittany—the last to be crowned as such. Dauphin François was given no effective control over the government of the duchy—to the chagrin of some of the Breton notables—which remained in the hands of his father.

Soon after the wedding, French envoys arrived in Brussels seeking ratification for the marriage articles that would provide for the cessation of Artois and Franche-Comté. Though the emperor met with them, he prevaricated—offering up excuses and raising quibbles with every minor issue within the treaty. “The emperor prevaricates,” the French envoy wrote in his private journal. “When he meets with us, it is only to complain and push off signing the final articles. First, he has desired to wrangle over the cash dowry that he agreed to pay for the princess; then he states that any cessation of territory will require approval from his eldest son who is too young to give it… then it is said that the cessation will require ratification from the provincial states… lately, he has changed his tact further, arguing that such a cessation will be prejudicial to his second son borne of his marriage to the Empress Renée, while registering his complaints with the Edict of Vannes, proclaiming that his wife’s rights (and by extension the rights of their children) have been jeopardized…” It was all an act: as Charles put off and prevaricated, he was arming troops in Flanders and Luxembourg under the command of the Prince of Orange and the Viscount of Strêye. In Besançon, local troops were augmented, while command of an imperial army in the region was placed under the command of Jean de Precipiano—to serve as an invasion force into Italy. Compared with Charles’ previous failures in the military field, he ensured that his troops had ample pay. These troubles carried throughout the winter of 1536—François dispatched envoys to December of 1536 in hopes of agreeing, but little of substance was achieved. Margaret of Austria, the emperor’s aunt and long a temporizing influence upon him fell severely ill towards the end of December. She designated Charles as her sole heir and encouraged Charles to maintain peace with France for the prosperity of the Low Countries. Her death on December 30th, 1536, marked an end to the era in the Low Countries: with her demise, Empress Renée would come to play a more prominent role in the affairs of the Low Countries.

By early 1537, all diplomatic attempts to solve the issue of Princess Isabelle’s dowry had collapsed. In January, Charles relented and intimated to François that he was prepared to hand over the provinces of Artois and Franche-Comté. This proved to be a ruse: in March of 1537, Charles broke off relations with François and recalled his ambassador from Paris. Imperial troops under the Prince of Orange invaded Picardy, while the Viscount of Strêye marched into northern France—attacking both Guise and Vervins. Jean de Precipiano led his troops from Dôle into the Duchy of Savoy, where Duke Charles of Savoy reaffirmed his alliance with the emperor and provided additional troops. By April, imperial troops had taken the city of Asti and pressed into Lombardy. From the south, Spanish troops under the command of Fernando de Toledo, the Duke of Alba. Alba began the Siege of Perpignan, subjecting the French border city to assaults of artillery fire. The quick attacks upon French territory shocked King François, who swore before his council: “Until the end of my days, I shall curse the emperor as the most perfidious man in all the Christendom—no better than the Turk; you cannot trust a word that he says, for he is a liar.” Even more shocking to the King of France was the position of his eldest son’s wife: “The daughter of the richest man in the world—and yet she has come to me as a beggar!” For her part, Isabelle was nonplussed, and showed unwavering loyalty towards her husband and his family—their cause was now hers. So began the War of Artois, or the Italian War of 1537, as it is known in some quarters.

500px-Titian_-_Supper_at_Emmaus_-_WGA22794.jpg

Supper at Emmaus, c. 1530.

François was quick to react to the emperor’s move—he ordered Paris and Reims fortified, and commanded his governor in Lombardy, Claude d’Annebault to defend the province to the last drop of blood. The first pitched battle between the rival armies occurred on April 23rd, 1537, when the Viscount of Strêye succeeded in scattering French troops at the Battle of La Hérie. “Vicomte Charles Brandon de Strêye proved his worth to the imperial cause at La Hérie… the French troops were scattered like dust, while the troops under Strêye suffered minimal losses. Strêye would write to his wife, Anna van Egmont, afterward: ‘We have avenged the humiliations at Longwy today.’ Strêye would find himself well rewarded—the emperor would grant him a pension of ƒ1500… and the domain of Erbisœul.” François found that in his new conflict against the emperor, he largely stood alone: Venice proclaimed neutrality in the conflict—while the Pope claimed poverty as his reason for staying away. The young Duke of Florence, having recently attained his majority happily signed into an alliance with the King of France—but used the outbreak of conflict as a reason to make war on the Republic of Siena, where a coterie of Ghibelline-aligned, oligarchs had recently come to power. Louis IV of Naples, who had wed François’ eldest daughter Louise in 1535 readily reaffirmed his alliance with France, and once more asserted his rights to the Kingdom of Sicily. By May of 1537, troops under the command of Jean de Precipiano began their march into Lombardy, where they met the troops under Annebault at the Battle of Monza, where imperial troops triumphed. Annebault’s forces suffered heavy causalities and were forced to abandon Milan. “The French abandoned their baggage train,” Precipiano would write in a letter to the emperor, bringing him the good news. “They have fled south like the cowards they are… and I intend to deal them a final blow.”

The collapse of French authority in the Duchy of Milan brought it back under Imperial authority for the first time in nearly twenty years. “The Milanese, though they were not enamored with their French overlords, had perhaps accepted the state of things,” one historian wrote. “There was no cheering as Precipiano’s troops occupied Milan—nor did the nobility clamor for the return of the Sforza.” The House of Sforza had been reduced in numbers—Massimiliano, who had been deposed in 1515, had died in 1528 in exile in France. There remained only his two brothers: Francesco, who had pursued a clerical career and had recently been made the Prince-Bishop of Liège. His youngest brother, Giovanni Paolo, remained attached to the imperial court but was unmarried and considered a non-entity. Both brothers agreed to cede their rights to Milan back to the emperor—in exchange they would receive pensions, while Giovanni would be enfeoffed as the Marquis of Chiavenna. François was facing an invasion from the Habsburgs on all sides—in the north, from Spain, and in Italy. He ordered his commanders in the south of France to abandon Perpignan, while fresh troops were raised at Orléans to deal with the Imperial incursion into northern France; François also ordered reinforcements to be raised at Lyon, to render aid to the Armée d’Italie.

In southern Italy, conflict brewed between Naples and Spain in Sicily. The Marquis of Geraci as Viceroy of Sicily sought to sow discord in Naples among the nobles who had not yet forgotten their allegiance to the House of Spain. Louis IV, in turn, sought to augment his growing naval forces by licensing pirates and corsairs to plunder Spanish shipping with Letters of Marque. The Neapolitan Marinaio, as they became known, were given rights to cargo and ships that they seized, with a royal tenth levied upon their captures which would go into the royal treasury. The Marinaio developed bases in Policastro, Gallipoli, and Cotrone—and would become an effective arm of Naples’ naval campaigns for years to come. Marinaio—damnable rogues, the lot of them…” a Catalan merchant from Barcelona wrote in his journal. “They have grown worse than the Moslems… I have lost three galleys this season, and cargo worth ƒ3000. This cannot continue—it must not. So many of my associates have been forced to declare bankruptcy, and I fear I will soon join them…” Throughout 1537, Louis IV began to put together plans for an invasion of Sicily—intent to claim the crown that had been denied to him almost seven years earlier.

400px-Saint_Barbara_%28National_Gallery_of_Slovenia%2C_copy_of_church_fresco_from_1453%29.jpg

Frescoe of Antonia of Savoy, painted as St. Barbara in Meran.

By the autumn of 1537, the French were on the counter-offensive—French troops invaded Savoy, and by October of 1537 had taken the city of Turin. Charles III was forced to seek refuge in Lombardy, while he sent his wife, Catherine—along with their four children to further safety in Venetian territory, in Verona—where they stayed for only a few months before enduring a journey through the winter into imperial territory in Meran. “We have reached Meran, by God’s Grace,” Catherine wrote in a pitiful letter to her brother. “We have nothing but the clothes upon our backs… both Catarina and Anna Gennara are well, as is Filippo Amadeo. Yet little Antonia is not… she has been wearied all through our journey and has cough has worsened. We shall stay here until she improves, as that is all I can do… I have not even the funds to consult a doctor…” Catherine’s youngest daughter, Antonia of Savoy did not improve—she perished on February 12th, 1538—and would be buried in St. Barbara’s Chapel behind the Church of Saint Nicholas in Meran. In France, Alba’s troops were lured into a trap—the French had abandoned Perpignan to them, leaving the route open to Narbonne. “Rather than scorch the fruit farms and vineyards that lined the path north to Narbonne, Georges de Boullan ordered that the fruit be left and allowed to overripe… the Spanish greedily ate the fruit left to them, but it was a poisoned gift—dysentery soon ravaged the Spanish troops, and Alba was obliged to retreat in ignominy—he and his troops once more fleeing south across the Pyrenees. Boullan found himself fabulously rewarded; he was granted the Duchy of Valentinois—a gift made even sweeter by his marriage in 1534 to Louise, the Dame of Châlus, better known as Louise de Borgia…”

Though the French had proven successful in the south of France, these successes did not hold in northern France. As the campaign season opened in the spring of 1538, command of the French troops in northern France fell to Jean III, the Duke of Lorraine. Among his junior officers was Louis—the Duke of Orléans and youngest son of King François, and François of Bourbon, Duke of Bourbon, and son of the deceased (and disgraced) Constable of Bourbon. The Duke of Lorraine led French troops in an attack against Imperial troops under the Prince of Orange at the Battle of Fresnoy. Though the Duke of Lorraine succeeded in holding the field, it came at a heavy cost—the young Duke of Orléans was killed in battle, cut down by a German Landsknecht—seen firsthand by the young Duke of Bourbon. “My youth and folly died that day upon the fields of Fresnoy,” Bourbon would write in his memoirs many decades later. “My years before Fresnoy had been without purpose; I lost my father at a young age and was raised in the household of Madame de Louise. I hated how unjustly my father had been treated, and truly lamented his death. I sought to regain the favor of the king, in hopes that my family’s name might be restored. All that I did was in honor of King François. When the emperor sent troops into France, I was the first to volunteer… I served alongside my cousin Monsieur d’Orléans at Fresnoy. He was valiant—valiant but stupid. I watched as charged at the German cavalryman…and watched just as quickly as he was gutted and left for dead. It was then that I realized how worthless battle was—and how little our lives meant, whether we were princes or peasants. That night, I truly believed that God spoke to me: He beseeched me to honor him and him above all others—the path to redemption was not through battle and war, but through our Holy Church.The Duke of Bourbon’s religious epiphany at Fresnoy would lead to him embarking upon an ecclesiastical career—becoming one of the founding fathers of the Isèrians, a religious order founded by him on the banks of the Isère River.

Louis IV’s planned invasion of Sicily was dealt a blow from two sides. Andrés de Mendoza, son of the Marquis of Cañete led a squadron of ships in a daring raid upon the docks of Naples, where he used small ships filled to the brim with gunpowder as explosives. Mendoza’s quick thinking caused grave damage to the Neapolitan docks—and sunk many warships as well as transport ships that Louis IV wished to use in his Sicilian campaign. Other troubles came from the Turks—with Heyreddin Barbarossa raiding Otranto and several other Neapolitan ports within the Adriatic Sea. “The corsairs from barbary appeared straight from the mist,” an anonymous writer wrote following the raid on Otranto. “They came as quickly as they left, plundering the docks as well the church, which they set ablaze. The whole town shakes with the cries and wails of men and women—sobbing over the men, women, and children who have been carried away, likely to be sold in the slave markets in Tripoli and Alexandria…” François’ Italian reinforcements succeeded in liberating the city of Asti, though they were unable to take back Milan—likewise, the troops under the Duke of Lorraine remained constrained by the forces commanded by the Prince of Orange and the Viscount of Strêye—though the Duke of Lorraine succeeded in taking back Vervins, the French army effectively remained barred from Artois and Low Countries.

500px-Truce_of_Nice_1538.jpg

The Truce of Lucca, 1539.

By 1539, all sides had begun to weary of the conflict: though the emperor had seized Milan, the French still maintained a sizable presence in Italy and had even occupied Savoy. Likewise, François’ goals remained unrealized: he had not taken either Artois or Franche-Comté and the jewel of his Italian territories, Milan, was now in the hands of his most hated enemy. Pope Pius V intimated that he was willing to help negotiate a new settlement between the King of France and the Holy Roman Empire, inviting the pair to Lucca in hopes of negotiating a new peace treaty. Begrudgingly, both François and Charles V agreed to attend—with Prince Ferdinand, Louis IV, and the Duke of Florence agreeing to send envoys. Charles, François, and Pius V all met at the Palazzo Publicco in Lucca, the mood stony and cold. “Relations between the King of France and the Holy Roman Emperor had deteriorated completely by the time they met in Lucca for peace negotiations,” Prince Arianitto Comène wrote in his private journal. “They entered the Palazzo at different times—and through different entrances. They refused to even sit in the same room together, and Pope Pius V was forced to travel from room to room in hopes of negotiating the peace…” Neither party had prevailed spectacularly, and yet both the king and the empire wished to have their cake and eat it too: François nourished hopes of getting what had been originally demanded as Isabelle’s dowry, while Charles envisioned Italy once more returning under his influence by retaining Milan as well as reclaiming Naples.

The Truce of Lucca, negotiated in May of 1539 effected no real change in the territorial makeup of Italy: Charles agreed to return the Duchy of Milan to François, but extracted a heavy price: François was forced to waive his rights to both Artois and Franche-Comté for Princess Isabelle’s dowry: he would instead be given 500,000 ducats. The Truce of Lucca also marked the detachment of Flanders from France and its integration into the Holy Roman Empire. Neither Charles nor his successors would be forced to pay homage to Flanders, which was added to the Burgundian Circle. Despite these victories, Charles did not gain any true territories: while he did not have to cede territory to France, he was forced to recognize Louis IV’s possession of the crown of Naples—with Louis IV in turn once again renouncing his rights to the Kingdom of Sicily. Lorenzo III, the young Duke of Florence seemed to triumph the best in the peace negotiations: though he was forced to make peace with the Republic of Siena and return the territories he had seized from the Republic, the emperor agreed to grant Lorenzo III the hand of his illegitimate daughter, Jeanne—a great victory for the Medici dynasty. The matter of Charles’ crowning was also decided—Pius V agreed to crown Charles as Holy Roman Emperor in Rome in 1540—it was agreed that the emperor’s Italienzug would pass through Venetian territory rather than the Duchy of Milan.

[1] Better known as Phébé or Phœbé; given that both Gaston Fébus and François Fébus used this epithet spelled as such in the language d’oc, Henri II’s daughter and heiress uses the similar spelling, named in honor of François Fébus, as well as her uncle.
 
Last edited:
Top